<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kabloony Tunes!!! (Or, Pas De Folie Adieu)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://birtherthinktank.wordpress.com/2012/08/05/kabloony-tunes-or-pas-de-folie-adieu/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://birtherthinktank.wordpress.com/2012/08/05/kabloony-tunes-or-pas-de-folie-adieu/</link>
	<description>Sometimes You Think Better When You&#039;re Tanked</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2013 00:37:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gordon of Khartoon Falls!!! &#171; The Birther Think Tank</title>
		<link>http://birtherthinktank.wordpress.com/2012/08/05/kabloony-tunes-or-pas-de-folie-adieu/#comment-3809</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gordon of Khartoon Falls!!! &#171; The Birther Think Tank]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Aug 2012 22:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birtherthinktank.wordpress.com/?p=3142#comment-3809</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] http://birtherthinktank.wordpress.com/2012/08/05/kabloony-tunes-or-pas-de-folie-adieu/ Like this:LikeBe the first to like this. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] <a href="http://birtherthinktank.wordpress.com/2012/08/05/kabloony-tunes-or-pas-de-folie-adieu/" rel="nofollow">http://birtherthinktank.wordpress.com/2012/08/05/kabloony-tunes-or-pas-de-folie-adieu/</a> Like this:LikeBe the first to like this. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter</title>
		<link>http://birtherthinktank.wordpress.com/2012/08/05/kabloony-tunes-or-pas-de-folie-adieu/#comment-3023</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Aug 2012 02:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birtherthinktank.wordpress.com/?p=3142#comment-3023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[BUT, the Wong Kim Ark court said the 14th was just affirming natural born citizenship as a right, in effect placing it into the amendments to protect it from tampering.Just like gun rights, or rights to a jury were put into Amendments for safekeeping.

Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BUT, the Wong Kim Ark court said the 14th was just affirming natural born citizenship as a right, in effect placing it into the amendments to protect it from tampering.Just like gun rights, or rights to a jury were put into Amendments for safekeeping.</p>
<p>Squeeky Fromm<br />
Girl Reporter</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Farrar</title>
		<link>http://birtherthinktank.wordpress.com/2012/08/05/kabloony-tunes-or-pas-de-folie-adieu/#comment-3018</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Farrar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 21:43:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birtherthinktank.wordpress.com/?p=3142#comment-3018</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see the 14th Amendment as existing, but no where does it address itself specifically to an Art. II, §1, cl. 5 natural born Citizen. I think statutory construction would require it to do so if such was the case.  

Since the 14th Amendment does not address itself to an Art. II, §1, cl. 5&#039;s natural born Citizen, a reasonable legal hypothesis would be the authors of the 14th Amendment simply did not see it affecting an Art. II, §1, cl. 5&#039;s natural born Citizen in the first place.  Whereas the 14th amendment bestowed US citizen at birth by positive law,  an Art. II, §1, cl. 5&#039;s &lt;strong&gt;natural&lt;/strong&gt; born US citizen received US citizenship through the natural transference of allegiance of the father.

ex animo
davidfarrar]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the 14th Amendment as existing, but no where does it address itself specifically to an Art. II, §1, cl. 5 natural born Citizen. I think statutory construction would require it to do so if such was the case.  </p>
<p>Since the 14th Amendment does not address itself to an Art. II, §1, cl. 5&#8242;s natural born Citizen, a reasonable legal hypothesis would be the authors of the 14th Amendment simply did not see it affecting an Art. II, §1, cl. 5&#8242;s natural born Citizen in the first place.  Whereas the 14th amendment bestowed US citizen at birth by positive law,  an Art. II, §1, cl. 5&#8242;s <strong>natural</strong> born US citizen received US citizenship through the natural transference of allegiance of the father.</p>
<p>ex animo<br />
davidfarrar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Farrar</title>
		<link>http://birtherthinktank.wordpress.com/2012/08/05/kabloony-tunes-or-pas-de-folie-adieu/#comment-3017</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[David Farrar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 21:41:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://birtherthinktank.wordpress.com/?p=3142#comment-3017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I see the 14th Amendment as existing, but no where does it address itself specifically to an Art. II, §1, cl. 5 natural born Citizen. I think statutory construction would require it to do so if such was the case.  

Since the 14th Amendment does not address itself to an Art. II, §1, cl. 5&#039;s natural born Citizen, a reasonable legal hypothesis would be the authors of the 14th Amendment simply did not see it affecting an Art. II, §1, cl. 5&#039;s natural born Citizen in the first place.  Whereas the 14th amendment bestowed US citizen at birth by positive law,  an Art. II, §1, cl. 5&#039;s &lt;strong&gt;natural&lt;/strong&gt; born US citizen received US citizenship through the natural transference of the father&#039;s allegiance.

ex animo
davidfarrar]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the 14th Amendment as existing, but no where does it address itself specifically to an Art. II, §1, cl. 5 natural born Citizen. I think statutory construction would require it to do so if such was the case.  </p>
<p>Since the 14th Amendment does not address itself to an Art. II, §1, cl. 5&#8242;s natural born Citizen, a reasonable legal hypothesis would be the authors of the 14th Amendment simply did not see it affecting an Art. II, §1, cl. 5&#8242;s natural born Citizen in the first place.  Whereas the 14th amendment bestowed US citizen at birth by positive law,  an Art. II, §1, cl. 5&#8242;s <strong>natural</strong> born US citizen received US citizenship through the natural transference of the father&#8217;s allegiance.</p>
<p>ex animo<br />
davidfarrar</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
