Comments on: Taitz In A Lather!!! (Or, Don’t Buy A Moose In A Poke)

By: Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter

Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter — Tue, 14 Aug 2012 23:02:47 +0000

Hi Leonard!!!

How about we meet behind CDR Kerchner’s Honey Wagon instead??? You get there first, and I’ll be right behind you. Just ignore the sound of any cranks turning, OK???

Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter

By: Leonard

Leonard — Tue, 14 Aug 2012 22:51:39 +0000

Sqeky Foam, you have committed a gross calummy against a wondrous Patriot. By publishing a PURLOINED DOCUMENT that you had no authority to even SEE, let alone BROADCAST, you have caused much pain and suffering.

I, therefore, challenge you to a round of fistingcuffs on the steps of the Illinois–no wait–Indiana state house. Should you decline due to the frialties of your gender, I propose a duel with 44 magnum revolvers across a hankerchief instead.

Treason must not go unpunished.

By: Reality Check

Reality Check — Tue, 14 Aug 2012 18:09:31 +0000

I have heard Orly called many things but “scourge of traders” is a new one.

By: Dave B.

Dave B. — Tue, 14 Aug 2012 17:31:45 +0000

I mean, we won’t get fooled again!

By: Dave B.

Dave B. — Tue, 14 Aug 2012 17:31:01 +0000

Hey, fool me once, shame on me.

By: Yulia

Yulia — Tue, 14 Aug 2012 16:35:21 +0000

You are braindead Obot and stupid. Dr Taitz would never use her dentist stationary to write court papers. Dr Taitz, esq, wife, mother, and scourge of traders, will hold you accountable for this defame.

By: Monkey Boy

Monkey Boy — Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:06:58 +0000

Squeeky

That was very unprofessional of you to print an unverified document; I’m sure that it caused no harm because it didn’t ridicule Dr. Taitz, esq, realtor, wife and mother. But, if by chance, it had been stupid, it might have defamed Orly Taitz, esq., etc.

Imagine if Dr. Taitz, esq., etc., printed something defamatory about someone prominent that was pure speculation and unproven? You Obots would be demanding that she face the jilatine(sic).

By: Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter

Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter — Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:45:55 +0000

Realist:

You are right. There is way too much weight for an Order. I figured she never did one before and OMG!!! I can’t wait to see what she put together. 50-50 the Judge kicks it back on her. maybe even 60-40.

Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter

By: Plutodog

Plutodog — Tue, 14 Aug 2012 02:02:28 +0000

Orly may be embarrassed and denying that you got the scoop on the proposed Order. Until I see it proved false by authorities (yes, more than one is necessary) on fake pdf’s, I’m holding out on declaring the scoop is poop.

By: realist

realist — Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:39:37 +0000

True, Dave.

Today she posted her FedEx receipts stating that she’d mailed her Proposed Order to the Clerk of the Count in IN. She did not, however, post the Proposed Order, so now we really don’t know whether it was real or not.

Well, except that the Proposed Order weighed .55 (a little over 1/2) pounds. WTF? LOL Only Orly could propose a simple 5-6 page Order that weights over half a pound.

Now, in her defense, perhaps she included her new Amended Complaint, which would account for the weight… maybe. But she didn’t state so, so I’m guessing it’s just the Proposed Order, in which case it must be a doozie!!

It it her first attempt. But even with 50 attempt it would still be wrong.