Sorry David, but the phrase “Little or no credible evidence” is a common euphemism phrase. It is simply a kind way of saying you’ve got nothing.

You’ve really become pathological in your denialsim fantasies as of late. That is a clear warning sign that what you really need is professional help.

Please stop using words you don’t understand.

So either learn to speak properly or shut up. Continued misuse of terms after they have been explained to you just makes you a liar and a fool.

Please stop saying “prima facie” for things that are clearly NOT. You are just embarassing yourself.

What you propose it to simply clog the courts with endless crazy crap, simply because you have a personal dislike/irrational fear of the current President and are too incompetent to bother with actual evidentiary standards.

ex animo
davidfarrar

I’ll cite a source if you will then promise to quit using the argument that Vattel in any way defines the term “natural born citizen”. If not, then you are just the dishonest fool that you appear to be and I wont enable your disgraceful behavior.

I think the judge said: “Little or no credible evidence “… which is definitely more than none.

In any case, I think the judge was using a higher level; of judicial notice than he should have applied in this case.

We shall see shortly when we file suit again after the DNC Convention and Obama is “officially” named and their nominee for president.

I assume you haven’t been able to find your cite on the 1760 English translation of de Vattel’s Law of Nations; have you?

ex animo
davidfarrar

You had no prima facie evidence. According to the judge, you didn’t have any credible evidence whatsoever, let alone evidence assumed by law to be valid on its face.

By the way… when the judge thinks your evidence is so bad that you couldn’t beat an empty chair, then your evidence has already been impeached.

ex animo
davidfarrar