Kansas, Bloody Kansas!!!

Although He Was Really Big In Local Politics, He Couldn’t Stop What Was Coming

WOW, the situation is getting desperate in Kansas! According to Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq., the poor Kansas Birther “feels for his life!” Here is the situation as reported at her website. I have edited it to take out some of the white spaces, and duplicate email headings:

(Click on Image to enlarge.)

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=295946

Even I must salute Dr. Taitz for fearlessly throwing herself into the lawless bloodbath that has become Kansas! Nothing I could say can add anything to this poignant interchange between the frightened Kansas Birther and his brave and dauntless attorney. Why, oh why isn’t the main stream press covering this story???

But I shall!!!  This is much more exciting than the Lifetime Movie Channel flick.

Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter

Note 1. Kansas, Bloody Kansas: As Wiki says:

Bleeding Kansas, Bloody Kansas or the Border War, was a series of violent political confrontations involving anti-slavery Free-Staters and pro-slavery “Border Ruffian” elements, that took place in the Kansas Territory and the neighboring towns of Missouri between 1854 and 1861. At the heart of the conflict was the question of whether Kansas would enter the Union as a free state or slave state. As such, Bleeding Kansas was a proxy war between Northerners and Southerners over the issue of slavery in the United States. The term “Bleeding Kansas” was coined by Horace Greeley of the New York Tribune; the events it encompasses directly presaged the American Civil War.

Congress had long struggled to balance the interests of slaveholders and abolitionists. The events later known as Bleeding Kansas were set into motion by the Kansas–Nebraska Act of 1854, which nullified the Missouri Compromise and instead implemented the concept of popular sovereignty. An ostensibly democratic idea, popular sovereignty stated that the inhabitants of each territory or state should decide whether it would be a free or slave state; however, this resulted in immigration en masse to Kansas by activists from both sides. At one point, Kansas had two separate governments, each with its own constitution, although only one was federally recognized. On January 29, 1861, Kansas was admitted to the Union as a free state, less than three months before the Battle of Fort Sumter which began the Civil War.

Note 2. The Image. John Steuart Curry’s John Brown mural at the Kansas state capitol,  painted by Curry in 1940-1941.

About these ads

About Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter

Hi!!! I am a Girl Reporter on the Internet. I am 29. Plus I am a INTP. I have a Major in Human Kinetics, and a Minor in English. I have 2 cats, and a poor little orphan Blue Jay named Squawky. I write poetry, and plus I am trying to learn how to play guitar. I think that is all??? Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter View all posts by Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter

30 responses to “Kansas, Bloody Kansas!!!

  • notaxj

    Squeeky. Carefully read how the name is spelled and how the name in the email address is spelled. It is more likely that this is someone punking Orly.

  • notaxj

    The guy doesn’t even know how to spell his own name. “Mountgomery” in the email and “Montgoumery” for the name in the reply. If this were really Joe Montgomery emailing her, do you think he’s misspell his own name?

  • Reality Check

    I have run out of words to describe Orly’s craziness. This is beyond the pale.

  • Dave B.

    Montgoumery Burns? Oh. My. God.

  • Dave B.

    And trust me, Joe, you don’t want Orly calling you “Monty”.

    • Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter

      Hi DaveB!!!

      They are even suspicious over at ORYR. Have you ever seen anything like this??? She is losing it big time.

      Squeeky Fromm
      Girl Reporter

      • Dave B.

        Hi back atcha, Squeeky! Say, you must be taking vitamins or something these days, you’re busy as a bee with these articles. I really like that last bit in Mr. “Mountgomery’s” e-mail: “Could you be in the cafeteria or on the front steps of the building one hour before the hearing to prepare the case?” Someone’s being very, very naughty.
        This one’s a classic.

  • notaxj

    All I have done is quickly scanned her replies to “Joe”. Orly is apparently going to treat them all to her DVD since she’s bringing a projector with testimony from her “expert” witlesses.

    I sure hope they do have cameras there tomorrow. It should be a highly entertaining day, especially at the end of the day after she’s gone to file her complaints at the Superior Court and then finishes by screaming treason on her blog.

  • Dave B.

    Hey, I found Joe– or could I call him Monty?– presenting his own case, in the flesh:

    It does add a certain je ne sais quoi you just don’t get from reading the complaint. Especially if you turn on the closed captions. Really.

  • Cindy "Monty" Montgomery

    As a Montgomery myself and even from Kansas and a gradute of Kansas State (shhh….don’t tell orly he is my 2nd cousin) I can assure you these were NOT emails from him. She got punked big time. Us Montgomerys KNOW how to spell our names and consider Monty a slur on our good name. SHE GOT PUNKED BIG TIME !

    • Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter

      Hi Cindy!!!

      Hmmm. You know, I was wondering if somebody who was already named “Montgomery” was behind this??? If so, I will have to award “them” a “Pwnee” for completely owning Orly Taitz.

      I sure can’t wait to find out who that might be. . .

      Squeeky Fromm
      Girl Reporter

  • Monkey Boy

    I looked on her website and this exchange apparently did take place! Oh, the stupidity. Orly was punked bigtime; this is the mother of all Orly punkings.

    I told Twinky Ike to stand down. This was a rogue operation.

  • Yulia

    Twinky Ike is big criminel. Always try to trick patriots and cause time waste. Need go to labor camp in Alyeska.

    Yulia very smart and tell every one not be tricked, but some not listen.

  • Mark

    If someone from Kansas is present at the hearing on Monday, I suppose you could innocently ask “What about assessing costs against Orly Taitz pursuant to Kansas Statute 25-308(e) so that we taxpayers do not have to pay for these proceedings?” Or, if Orly is about to be allowed to present evidence or speak, ask “Is this out-of-state person willing to stipulate to be subject to an assessment of costs pursuant to Kansas Statute 25-308(e) so that we Kansas taxpayers do not have to pay for these proceedings?”

    It seems that the real Joe Montgomery withdrew his objection to avoid the costs provision found in Kansas Statute 25-308(e), not because of duress. He submitted all his evidence, wrote all his arguments, and was able to present further oral arguments. It became apparent that the Commission was skeptical of his legal theories and evidence. Therefore, Mr. Montgomery withdrew his objection in the hope that the Commission would not assess costs against him at Monday’s hearing. Since Orly Taitz is not representing the real Joe Montgomery and is not potentially subject to subsection (e), I seriously doubt that the Commission is legally obligated to allow Orly to address it. In fact I would argue that, especially because Orly Taitz would be running up the costs to Kansas taxpayers which are not recoverable, the Commission has a duty to Kansas voters and taxpayers not to incur further costs by entertaining Orly Taitz’s arguments and presentation of evidence which, based upon her prior history, could take hours if not days.

    “25-308:

    (e) The causes for objection under this section as to any office may be any of those causes listed in K.S.A. 25-1436, and amendments thereto. The officers determining any objections under this section may assess any costs arising from such determination to either the objector or objectee in accordance with the determination made. Such costs shall be paid to the secretary of state or the county election officer, as the case may be, and deposited in the treasury of the state or county to the credit of its general fund. If such costs are not paid within 10 days after being fixed, the secretary of state or county election officer shall make a certificate of the facts and file it with the clerk of the district court in the county where the person resides who must pay such costs. Such clerk of the district court shall collect such costs as in cases of collection of court costs, and when collected such costs shall be disposed of as are court costs in such district court.”

  • G

    Interesting info about the 25-308 cost assessments clause.

    Thanks Mark, for providing that and your impressions on how that may have impacted Montgomery’s decision to proceed.

    KUDOS!!!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 46 other followers

%d bloggers like this: