Comments on: Butterdezillion: Still Crazy As A Betsy Bug!!!

By: G

Tue, 25 Sep 2012 03:18:07 +0000

It is certifying the information contained on that document. Sorry, but when you have the official authorizing agency consistently and repeatedly backing the information shown on the form, that is as legit of an attestment to its authenticity as you can get.

This isn’t like “identity fraud”, in which some third-party would forge a real document. In those situations, you wouldn’t have the official issuing agency coming out and backing the forged documents.

So sorry to break your deperate fantasy bubble of twist-and-spin here, but the ONLY viable challenge to a certified birth certificate would require there to exist an even more credible document that made the first one appear suspect.

…And for that to even be a possibility, you wouldn’t have the official issuing agency repeatedly coming to bat for that document in the first place.

What you are weaselly insinuating is that the entire HI DOH (and pretty much the entire US government) is part of some vast conspiracy…that’s an extremely bold charge and a ludicrous one at that.

By: j.h. osborne

j.h. osborne — Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:30:30 +0000

A certified copy is a copy (often a photocopy) of a primary document, that has on it an endorsement or certificate that it is a true copy of the primary document. It does not certify that the primary document is genuine, only that it is a true copy of the primary document.

From Wikipedia!

By: Jane Whitman

Jane Whitman — Sun, 23 Sep 2012 01:47:16 +0000

Phleghmtastic, Squeeky!!! You pick your words so well.

By: Northland10

Northland10 — Sat, 22 Sep 2012 17:17:26 +0000

By: Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter

Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter — Sat, 22 Sep 2012 17:16:18 +0000

Hi Jane Whitman!

LOL! That snot beyond the realm of possibility! Goodness nose, maybe that is why the Birthers are having a booger of a time getting their hands on it.

Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter

By: Jane Whitman

Jane Whitman — Sat, 22 Sep 2012 16:51:25 +0000

Maybe Butter has a point here. What if the vault copy has a booger smear on it and the PDF doesn’t? A hard booger would probably be picked up in the scan but a clear slimey one might evade detection.

DNA analysis could determine whose booger was used to alter the document and forensic dating could put to rest for once and for all when the document was altered.

But the real problem is that none of the verification requests have specifically asked Dr. Onaka whether the document is or is not booger free upon close inspection. This is a “must-include” item the next time a verfication request is made.

By: Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter

Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter — Sat, 22 Sep 2012 16:49:44 +0000

Realist:

Thank you! I noticed she was holding court over at Free Republic and wowing them with her brilliant insight. What a bunch of maroons. The whole bunch of ‘em are brain dead.

Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter

By: realist

realist — Sat, 22 Sep 2012 14:15:06 +0000

Squeeky…. You do a great job of making sense from butterbazillion’s nonsense. That is kinda scary.