Tag Archives: Jung

The Precedent For The Prescient President (Or, Meeting The Jung Obama)

I Met Him In Chattanooga, And He Said He Was From Kenya, Or Maybe Indonesia. . . But I'm Sure It Was Him!

This Internet Article could easily  be expanded to take up an entire book or two, but I will try to keep it short and readable. Before Postman Allen Hulton, there was another story where someone supposedly met the Young Obama, who said he was from Indonesia, and born in Kenya, and would be President one day.  That person was the Freeper Race Bannon.  Here are excerpts from his 2009 tale:

I believe with all sincerity and truthfulness. I am making nothing up here, except maybe a few words to keep a written dialog in readable form, but I believe I met Barak Obama in Hawaii in 1980 in Honolulu .

What strikes me most is what he said as to where he grew up: Indonesia . He told me he wanted to be President of the US someday. I remember lightly smiling and commenting that maybe by the time he gets to be 40 or so, America will be ready for a Black man to be President and I wished him luck. We spoke of the racial tensions I saw at home while growing up and I asked him if he ever saw that overseas or since he returned back to Hawaii . I don’t remember his answer, but we spoke more of his time overseas and his thoughts on life and philosophy of government. He made some strange comments to me, it was obvious he never set foot for any time on continental United States and I told him he better realize that he is making judgments about the United States when he himself never actually lived there. I told him, “ Hawaii aint the United States !”

He also told me something that I never forgot, for it caused me to do some other things in an effort to be nice to him and possibly a favor. We spoke of where I had been and the world as I saw it. I told him I had been to Africa , Mombassa specifically, and he said to me abruptly, “I was born there”. I told him he is not eligible to be president if that was true, but I remembered he said his mom was an American, so, maybe it was okay. But it was what I did after that makes this a true memory: I went back to the barracks and told others of this guy and suggested we all grab our photo albums and visit him again and show him pictures of Mombassa so he could see where he was from.

While I cannot swear it was Barak Obama, all the details I do remember of that chance encounter fit the profile of the man who some people claim is born in Kenya and others claim he was born in Hawaii . The man I met was about 18, thin, Mulatto, told me he was born in Mombassa, raised overseas, was living in Hawaii and hadn’t yet been to many places in the world outside of those places, mostly, hadn’t been to the mainland of America for any long time period if at all. And he openly told me he wanted to be President.

You can read the full story with all the embellishments here:

http://noiri.blogspot.com/2009/11/first-hand-witness-to-obama-admitting.html

Luckily, Mr. Bannon made a few boo-boos writing his story, and Blogger Barackrypal picked up on them, and busted him out:

http://barackryphal.blogspot.com/2011/08/jim-racebannon-bancroft-birtherisms.html

The stories have these things in common, like:

1. Indonesia;
2. Kenya;
3. The inability to remember the person’s strange sounding name;
4. The post de facto realization that it was Barack Obama;
5. The innocuous, casual nature of the encounter;
6. The ambiguous time frame of the meeting; and
7. The stranger’s intention to be President one day.

But, it is the last one that get’s my attention. Notice the similarities to the Postman Story in the “I will be President” element:

Hulton remembers asking the young man what his plans were for the future.

“He looked right at me and told me he was going to be president of the United States,” Hulton says.

“There was a little bit of a grin on his face when he said it – he sounded sure of himself, but not arrogant. I know how people will say things because they have an ambition, but it did not come across that way,” Hulton says. “It came across as if this young black male was telling me he was going to be president, almost as if it were the statement of a scientific fact that had already been determined, as if his being president had been already pre-arranged.”

Hulton says the claim made him speechless.

http://www.wnd.com/2012/03/postman-ayers-family-put-foreigner-obama-through-school/

I have not read any of Obama’s books or biographies, but a quick scan of the Intertubz has not revealed that he had any such thoughts at an early age. Assuming that this element is a totally invented one, the question arises, “Why???”

To be a run-of-the-mill King Incognito or Angel Unaware type folk tale, or even a flat-out lie, Obama does not need to be anything other than the future President. This common, but unnecessary, element of both stories seems to be some sort of subconscious elevation of Obama to divine status, where he has some astral plane knowledge of his destiny. This would fit in quite well with Obama being called “The One” or “The Annointed One” by many conservative pundits.

I wonder if some of Obama’s opponents have bought into their own hyperbole, to the point where “Barack The Magic Negro“, as Rush Limbaugh has called him, has truly become magic to them on some subconcious level??? I expect more of these type of “I Met The Young Obama”  stories to arise, much like the flying saucer stories arose a few decades before.  About which Carl Jung said:

In the threatening situation of the world today, when people are beginning to see that everything is at stake, the projection-creating fantasy soars beyond the realm of earthly organizations and powers into the heavens, into interstellar space, where the rulers of human fate, the gods, once had their abode in the planets…. Even people who would never have thought that a religious problem could be a serious matter that concerned them personally are beginning to ask themselves fundamental questions. Under these circumstances it would not be at all surprising if those sections of the community who ask themselves nothing were visited by `visions,’ by a widespread myth seriously believed in by some and rejected as absurd by others.–C. G. Jung, in Flying Saucers

Could this also relate to the numerous irrational Birther beliefs that are so evident to those of us who follow this issue?  Consider this discussion of the flying saucer phenomenon, from ALIENS AND ARCHETYPES with TERENCE McKENNA:

MISHLOVE: Well, that suggests to me that if we look at some of the most bizarre, most anomalous cases that we have, such as UFOs, we begin to ask ourselves not so much what are they, because that’s a mystery, but what is their function? How are they affecting us? That’s like holding up a mirror to ourselves, and it tells us a great deal about the basic mystery of our mind and our reality.

McKENNA: Yes, this is the so-called postmodern approach — to ask the question, not what is the UFO, but what is it doing to us? Jacques Vallee pioneered this approach. And the answer is fascinating. What the UFOs are doing to us, to global society, is they are eroding faith in science by casting directly in the path of science a kind of gauntlet, a challenge: “Crack this” — almost as if the cosmic giggle had shown up at the bachelor party of science to spoil the bash, in the same way that the resurrection of Christ posed a tremendous problem for the intellectuals of late Roman antiquity, because they had no place in their world view for someone rising from the dead. They were Greek materialists, atomists essentially.

In that same way, the UFO challenges the assumptions of science, and I think in that sense Jung was really onto something when he saw it as coming from the unconscious. It is like an object coming from the unconscious with a compensatory function — to turn us away from the rational and toward the intuitive; to turn us away from the paternalistic, Apollonian, solar, masculine view of things, and toward a kind of watery, lunar, mysterious, intuitively felt feminine force — almost as though the UFO is a manifestation of Gaia as mother goddess. Science, as the proudest — pardon the word — erection of the rational mind, then is challenged by something from an entirely other dimension, an entirely other realm, that concretizes for us the culture crisis. And that’s why I’ve gotten into UFOs; I think they are important for a resolution of the culture crisis. They concretize the struggle between the paternalistic-masculine and the lunar-feminine, between a dominator society and the kind of partnership society that we require to survive.

http://www.intuition.org/txt/mckenna.htm

You can’t really consider these I Met The Young Obama stories to be Urban Legends because we are getting them first hand. They are not coming from the un-named second-cousin of a friend of the writer.  Neither are these Folk Tales strictly speaking, because once again, we get them from named sources.  However, they may morph into such with subsequent re-tellings.  For now, that leaves them to be either  flat out lies, or subconscious expressions from somewhere deep in the psyche. Or, a combination of both.

When I consider some of the debates I have had with intensely irrational Birthers wherein well-settled legal certainties are trumped by their gnostic-like knowledge, the subconscious approach may be worth pursuing.  Some Birthers do seem to have convinced themselves that they are right.  Sooo, I will try to keep my subconscious mind open. Can a person do that???

Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter

UPDATE!!! After publishing this, I discovered that Loren of The Fogbow had already published an Internet Article that had two more instances related to a variant of the Prescient President, I think should be called the Annointed President  These fit more into the Urban Legend mode, since they are third-hand re-tellings at least:

Tom Fife: “Well, I think you are going to be surprised when you get a black president very soon…You don’t believe me, but he is real and I even know his name. His name is Barack. His mother is white and American and his father is black from Africa. That’s right, a chocolate baby! And he’s going to be your President.”

Tim Dowling’s Friend: A friend whose identity I have forgotten pointed to a teenaged, thin fellow who certainly was Barack Obama and asked me: “Do you know that he is being groomed for the Presidency?”

Here is the link to the whole thing, which I found at Obama Conspiracy Theories:

http://www.thefogbow.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=25&t=7215&hilit=mailman&start=1075#p356806

Note 1. The Image. This is Shoe Shine Boy by Derrick Woodford, (American, b.1957), oil on canvas, 30″ x 24″. It may seen here, and is apparently still for sale:

http://www.antiquehelper.com/item/350584


The Dreckled Band (Or, We Are Going to Stoke Moran This Day!!!)

The Men From Scotland Yard Were Somewhat Taken Aback That The Birther Wasn't Wearing Any Pants

Well, I guess if it was a snake, it would have bit us. Here the Birthers are claiming that Obama is a British citizen and we have all missed the obvious response:  If Obama, by operation of British law is a British citizen, then why are you suing in American courts??? 

I mean, think about it for a minute. If there is some aspect of British law which is relevant, and you want to see it enforced, or to obtain a declaratory judgment, why would anyone go to an American court???  British courts should be involved. These suits should be taking place in England.  Scotland Yard should be involved.

Duh!!!

Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter

Notes:  Well this is a strange Internet Article where the Notes will be longer than the article.

First, the title The Dreckled Band is a play on the Sherlock Holmes short story, The Speckled Band. Dreck is defined as:

/drɛk/[drek]
noun Slang.
1. excrement; dung.
2. worthless trash; junk.
Also, drek.

Origin:
1920–25; < Yiddish drek; cognate with German Dreck filth; compare Old English threax, Old Norse threkkr excrement

I use Dreckled Band to describe the Birthers as a group covered up in various forms of bullsh*t.

The alternative title We Are Going to Stoke Moran This Day! is a direct quote from the story.   Stoke Moran was the name of the town, particularly the ancestral mansion where the crimes took place in the story. The statement, by Sherlock Holmes:

“And so do I. It is precisely for that reason that we are going to Stoke Moran this day. I want to see whether the objections are fatal, or if they may be explained away. But what in the name of the devil!”

Of course, there is a secondary meaning which plays on the words stoke and moranStoke means:

stoked past participle, past tense of stoke (Verb)
Verb:

1. Add coal or other solid fuel to (a fire, furnace, or boiler).
2. Encourage or incite (a strong emotion or tendency): “his composure had the effect of stoking her anger”.

And moran, as defined by the Urban Dictionary:

1. The ironic way to spell moron.
“Get a brain! Morans”
2. The preferred method of spelling “moron” by morons, particularly that of a Missouri redneck at a rally supporting the US led war in Iraq.

Both based on this iconic image:

So in effect, I am inciting the Birther morans with my suggestion they seek redress in British courts.

The Image of the two men and the baboon above is an actual illustration from The Speckled Band. The reference to the Birther having no pants is an allusion to Jungian Dream Analysis wherein nakedness can be interpreted as:

Nudity also symbolizes being caught off guard. Finding yourself naked at work or in a classroom, suggests that you are unprepared for a project at work or school. You may be unprepared in making a well informed decision. With all eyes on you, you fear that some flaw will be brought to public attention. You fear that people will see through your true self and you will be exposed as a fraud or a phony.

http://dreammoods.com/cgibin/nakeddreams.pl?method=exact&header=dreamid&search=nakedintro

It is the Birther who is naked, and truly, most of us see right through them.

The Easter Egg in the Image, My Dear Watson, I Think He Means His Checkbook Is In The Office is based on the statement by Dr. Grimesby Roylott upon bursting into Holmes and Watson’s room:

Ha! You put me off, do you?” said our new visitor, taking a step forward and shaking his hunting-crop. “I know you, you scoundrel! I have heard of you before. You are Holmes, the meddler.”

My friend smiled.

“Holmes, the busybody!”

His smile broadened.

“Holmes, the Scotland Yard Jack-in-office!”

Jack-in-office is an English term meaning, a self important petty official. Jack is also a slang term for money. . .oh  well, you get it.  I am not sure if Holmes actually received a 1099 from Scotland Yard for this adventure. Tax laws only require certain records be kept for five years, and this took place in 1892.

There is another huge groaner in the article, but disclosing it would be spoilers for those who have not read the story. Which may be found, with illustrations, at this link:

http://wikisource.org/wiki/User_talk:%D0%A2

It is short, and worth the read.


Night Of The Living Brain-Dead Zombies!!! (Vattel Birthers)

It Was Eerie!!! They Just Kept Mumbling, "Minor Happersett, Minor Happersett."

Zombie movies are very popular right now, and AMC’s series, “The Walking Dead”  is doing so well that it has been renewed for a third season just two shows into the second season. Being one of the few people who actually owns the  Carl Jung art book,  Man and His Symbols, I have to wonder if all this zombie stuff is a manifestation of our collective unconscious and archetypes. Do the mobs of brain-dead zombies intent on eating other people alive have any relationship to something in our REAL lives??? This is the kind of stuff Think Tanks have to think about.

While there are probably many such correlations that can be made, I think that you have to add Vattle Birthers to the mix. (Vattle Birthers is my humorous sarcastic name for the two-citizen parent Birthers who think Emerich de Vattel is the source of our laws.) Anybody who has debated these people knows what I mean.  The Vattle Birthers have no sense of reality, and the fact that their theories are not supported by either a recognizable legal basis, or any relationship to historical facts, does not deter them. They just keep banging their heads into those brick walls long past the point where the gray matter looks like mashed potatoes.

For example, take their latest and most popular argument, the case of Minor v. Happersett (1875). Historically, this case was pretty much a voting rights case, where the court ruled that the 14th Amendment did not create a woman’s rights to vote.  (There are many Internet Articles here which discuss this case.) The Minor court did a brief survey of citizenship, in general, to see if women were considered citizens before the 14th Amendment and did being a citizen then confer the right to vote. The Plaintiff, Virginia Minor was native-born,  and all sides admitted she was a citizen, so the Minor court did not have to decide what citizenship was. Here is what they said:

The Constitution does not, in words, say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. As to this class there have been doubts, but never as to the first. For the purposes of this case it is not necessary to solve these doubts.

Vattle Birthers often present the first part of that paragraph, and omit the bolded part. Then they try to shoehorn what the Court said into being a complete definition of natural born citizenship. Which, even if it were, it would have been over-ruled by the Wong Kim Ark case 23 years later.  But most people who can read English, understand that the Minor court left the issue open. This does not require a law school education to figure out.

Further, if Reality matters, Judge Waite, who wrote the Minor Decision swore in Chester Arthur as President 6 years this decision. Arthur’s father was a non-citizen when Chester Arthur was born. The opposition in the 1880 Presidential race tried to run a smear campaign on Arthur, claiming he was not born in the United States, while completely ignoring the issue of Arthur’s non-citizen father. Common sense tells you this would not have happened if historically, Minor v. Happersett was seen as providing a compete definition of natural born citizenship.

Both of these facts were noted in a 2009 decision by the Indiana Court of Appeals. The three judges unanimously agreed the Minor court left the issue open, when after providing the above quote, they said:

Id. at 167-168. Thus, the [Minor] Court left open the issue of whether a person who is born within the United States of alien parents is considered a natural born citizen.12

Pretty simple, huh? That same court also noticed the Chester Arthur thingy:

[16] We note that President Obama is not the first U.S. President born of parents of differing citizenship. Chester A. Arthur, the twenty-first U.S. President, was born of a mother who was a United States citizen and a father who was an Irish citizen. See THOMAS C. REEVES, GENTLEMAN BOSS, THE LIFE OF CHESTER ALAN ARTHUR 3-4 (1975). During the election of 1880, there arose a rumor “that [Arthur] had been born in Canada, rather than in Vermont as he claimed, and was thus constitutionally ineligible to become the Chief Executive.” Id. at 3. Although President Arthur‟s status as a natural born citizen was challenged in the 1880 Presidential Election on the grounds that he was born in Canada rather than Vermont, the argument was not made that because Arthur‟s father was an Irish citizen he was constitutionally ineligible to be President. See generally id.

Here is a link to the Ankeny v. Governor case if you want to read it for yourself. It is short, and simple, and shoots the Vattle Birthers down in flames over Indianapolis:

http://birtherthinktank.wordpress.com/the-case-the-two-citizen-parent-birthers-just-hate/

But, does  any of this stop the Vattle Birthers??? Nope. They take the low road and keep a’ coming through the lie. Joseph Farah, editor of World Net Daily has jumped on the Minor Happersett band wagon and the Vattle Birther mob is right behind him.

Wiki says that ” a brain-dead individual has no clinical evidence of brain function upon physical examination. When a person can’t understand something as simple as the above on Minor v. Happersett, brain death is a strong possibility.  They’re a mob, and they are trying to eat our brains, too. Yeah, they’re ZOMBIES!!!

Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter

NOTE: If you are interested in the Carl Jung book, here is a link to the book, which is just FULL of pictures and art!

http://books.google.com/books/about/Man_and_his_symbols.html?id=EuBOAAAAMAAJ

Here is something about archetypes from wiki:

According Carl Jung, “archetypes” are innate universal psychic dispositions that form the substrate from which the basic symbols or representations of unconscious experience emerge. According to Jung there are four universal archetypes: Mother, Rebirth, Spirit, and Trickster (or Devil).

And yes, monsters can be archetypes!

http://jungian.info/library.cfm?idsLibrary=9


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 35 other followers