In a stunning rebuke of Mario Apuzzo, Esq.’s and Leo Donofrio Esq.’s ludicrous Birther legal theories, an Arizona judge dismissed another Birther lawsuit.
Here is a pdf of the decision from The Fogbow’s scribd page:
Here is the really fun language:
Most importantly, Arizona courts are bound by United States Supreme Court precedent in construing the United States Constitution, Arizona v. Jay J. Garfield Bldg. Co., 39 Ariz. 45, 54, 3 P.2d 983, 986 (1931), and this precedent fully supports that President Obama is a natural born citizen under the Constitution and thus qualified to hold the office of President. See United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649, 702-03 (1898) (addressing U. S. Const. amend. XIV); Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana, 916 N.E.2d 678, 684-88 (Ind. App. 2010) (addressing the precise issue). Contrary to Plaintiff’s assertion, Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874), does not hold otherwise.
Once again, the courts have slapped the idiotic two citizen-parent theory down. And the ludicrous Minor v. Happersett interpretation the Birthers peddle. I am curious what the Birther accusations will be. Probably, that this court is corrupt, or scairt, or liberal, or on the take, or whatever, or all of the foregoing.
You can be assured that you will not hear, “Uh, maybe Mario Apuzzo, Esq. and Leo Donofrio, Esq. are wrong???”
Note 1. The Image and the Easter Egg. The Image is Enrico Caruso in Pagliacci. As Wiki says:
Pagliacci was an instant success and it remains popular today. It contains one of opera’s most famous and popular arias, “Recitar! … Vesti la giubba” (literally, To perform! … Put on the costume, but more often known in English as On with the motley).
The applicable definition of motley here is the particolored costume of a jester.