Arpaio’s F Bomb Is A Dud!!! (The Obama Forgery Test)

Arpaio Was Well Known For His Short Fuse

Sheriff Joe, Deputy Zullo, Jerome “Jerry” Corsi, and other Birthers have been dropping F Bombs left and right since the initial March 12, 2012 press conference. “F” here stands for “Forgery.”  On July 17, 2012, Arpaio held another press conference and doubled-down on the forgery claim.  Meanwhile, outside the Birther Asylum, and the Anti-Birther Butterfly-Net Shore Patrol,  the whole issue is a dud.

The Birther Press is busy chest-thumping like two horny male gorillas about the lack of Main Stream Press coverage, and pouting like little snotty-nosed kids because the Conservative Big Shots, like Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck, don’t want to play with them. Maybe it is the whole snot-thing???

Others, like Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. and numerous Freeper Birfers, are filled with indignation because the saner part of the universe simply ignores Arpaio and the Cold Case Posse’s claims of forgery. Sooo, I have decided to deconstruct the issue and get down to specifics. First, let us get a workable definition of forgery. This one, from the Free Legal Dictionary, seems typical:

The creation of a false written document or alteration of a genuine one, with the intent to defraud.

Forgery consists of filling in blanks on a document containing a genuine signature, or materially altering or erasing an existing instrument. An underlying intent to defraud, based on knowledge of the false nature of the instrument, must accompany the act.

Since the word defraud is used twice, let’s define that word also, from the same source:

[T]o use deceit, falsehoods, or trickery to obtain money, an object, rights or anything of value belonging to another.

Legally, any erroneous information would have to have been put in, or altered,  with the intent to defraud, so that simple clerical errors or harmless mistakes would not constitute forgery. For example, if a clerk penciled in the number “9” for the Father’s Race, when the correct code should have been “2”, there is no forgery.  Mainly, because there was no evil intent and no one is being defrauded of anything.

Suppose Obama’s real father was Frank Marshall Davis, and not Barack Obama Sr., and Stanley Dunham did not know this, perhaps having slept with both men. Then there would be no forgery. There is no intent to defraud. If, on the other hand, she knew that Frank Marshall Davis (FMD) was the actual father, but listed BO, Sr. as the father anyway, then there would be forgery, of a sort, by the creation of a false document.

But even then, the intent to defraud somebody would have to be proven.  It is possible that FMD and BO, Sr. could have agreed to such a listing.  Or, if by supplying false information, Stanley Dunham sought to obtain something of value, either money or some right, then there could have been an intent to defraud. The important thing is that the intent to defraud has to be proven, not just assumed.

By definition, any alteration would have to be legally material, that is  significant and important, to fit within the definition of forgery. For example, if someone altered the place of birth from Kenya to Hawaii, that would be material. If someone enhanced a barely legible letter, to make it more legible, that would be probably be immaterial. Either way, an intent to defraud would still have to be proven.

All right, now that we have a workable definition of forgery and the intent to defraud and material, let’s look at the online long form:

Remember, that the Hawaii DOH says a long form exists, so unless some information has been added, erased, or changed from that original, then there is no forgery. Mere non-material alteration is NOT forgery. I went through the document and here is a list of 43 items which constitute the information contained on the online document:

File Number 151 on top

Certificate Number 61 10641 on top

Green Security Paper Background

Apr 25 2011 stamped on bottom

Certification on bottom with handwritten Alvin T. Onaka, Ph.D. and stamped State Registrar

1a. Child’s First Name – Barack

1b. Child’s Middle Name – Hussein

1c. Child’s Last Name – Obama, II

2. Sex – Male

3. This Birth – single block marked (as opposed to twin or triplet) and two “x’s” and a “dash” penciled in.

4. If Twin or Triplets Was Child Born 1st, 2nd, 3rd – No Information Entered

5a. Birth Date – August 4, 1961

5b. Hour – 7:24 PM

6a. Place of Birth (City) –  Honolulu

6b. Island – Oahu

6c. Name of Hospital – Kapiolani Maternity & Gynecological Hospital

6d. Is Place of Birth Inside City Limits – Yes block is marked.

7a. Usual Residence of Mother (City) – Honolulu

7b. Island – Oahu

7c. County and State – Honolulu, Hawaii

7d. Street Address – 6085 Kalanianaole Highway

7e. Is Residence Inside City Limits – Yes blocked is marked

7f. Mother’s Mailing Address – No Information Entered

7g. Is Residence Inside City Limits – Yes block is marked and number “2” is penciled in.

8. Full Name of Father – Barack Hussein Obama

9. Race of Father – African and number “9” is penciled in.

10. Age of Father – 25

11. Birthplace – Kenya, East Africa and number “2” is penciled in.

12a. Usual Occupation – Student and a “dash” and a “o” are penciled in.

12b. Kind of Business or Occupation – University and number “9” is penciled in.

13. Full Maiden Name of Mother – Stanley Ann Dunham

14. Race of Mother – Caucasian and number “1” is penciled in.

15. Age of Mother – 18

16. Birthplace – Wichita, Kansas and an “a” (?) is penciled in.

17a. Type of Occupation Outside Home During Pregnancy – None and a “0” is penciled in.

17b. Date Last Worked – No Information Entered and a “0” is penciled in.

18a. Signature of Parent – Handwritten (Stanley) Ann Dunham Obama, with block checked for Parent.

18b. Date of Signature – Handwritten 8-7-61

19a. Signature of Attendant – Handwritten David A. Sinclair with M.D. block checked.

20. Date Accepted by Local Registrar – Stamped August 8, 1961

21. Signature of Local Registrar – Handwritten V K L Lee

22. Date Accepted by Reg. General – Stamped August 9 – 1961

23. Evidence for Delayed Filing or Alteration – No Information Entered

Now, for the Crickets Test.

Question 1:  Which item(s) of information above has been substantially proven by The Cold Case Posse to  be an alteration of a genuine item,  that is, information materially altered (changed, added, or erased) and different from the original long form birth certificate???

Answer: Crickets.

Question 2:  Which item(s) of information above has been substantially proven by The Cold Case Posse to be false from the very creation of an original document???

Answer: Crickets.

Question 3:  Which item(s) of information above has been substantially proven by The Cold Case Posse to constitute any intent to defraud some other person and obtain some benefit???

Answer: Crickets.

Question 4:  Notwithstanding any other question and/or answer, which item(s) of information above has been substantially proven by The Cold Case Posse to constitute a legally material alteration of any original information???

Answer: Crickets

I would submit that Sheriff Joe, Deputy Zullo, The Cold Case Posse, Jerome “Jerry” Corsi, and other Birthers have completely and utterly failed to prove any of the elements of a forgery claim. Not only have they failed to substantially prove any of the forgery elements, they have not even made a credible  allegation of any element of forgery.

The closest they have come is to argue that the penciled in “9” in the Race of Father block, is either incorrect, or should have resulted in an empty block.  Which is at least debatable, and factually incorrect in my opinion.

Yet even on that point, there has been no proof offered that the original long form document did not have such an entry.Additionally,  and even if they were correct, they have offered no evidence which shows any intent to defraud anyone, nor have they even bothered to hazard a theory how such an boo-boo could tend to defraud anyone.

Are they truly so incompetent that they fail to realize any of this,  or do they just not care???

Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter

Note 1:  Here is a separate PDF of the Obama Forgery Test to better help you snare the unwary Birther. Feel free to use it and distribute it.

The Obama Forgery Test


About Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter

Hi!!! I am a Girl Reporter on the Internet. I am 34. Plus I am a INTP. I have a Major in Human Kinetics, and a Minor in English. I have 2 cats, and a new kitten! I write poetry, and plus I am trying to learn how to play guitar. I think that is all??? Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter View all posts by Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter

31 responses to “Arpaio’s F Bomb Is A Dud!!! (The Obama Forgery Test)

  • Mitchina

    If I understand the results of the posse, they identified the long form as completely fabricated. Hence FRAUD. And to answer your two questions, if that’s what they were – you are asking for them to compare the facts of the long form TO THE LONG FORM for alterations when in fact Arpaio and posse are saying that they have identified this as fraudulently pieced together – so what was changed in that document is unknown since it is compared to nothing – not the truth, not the original and not yet another fraudulent document. It will be hard to prove with accomplices REFUSING to provide the original birth certificate – which is the whole reason they won’t because they KNOW THIS DOCUMENT WAS MANUFACTURED LONG AFTER THE FACTS WERE MADE. And I submit,OMG you’re a dumbass chick – just STFU – you are embarrasing yourself.

    Frank Marshall Davis was never brought up in the Arpaio statements so throwing that our there was just you being a distracting asshole. So tell me what IS the truth when the facts say the entire document has been pieced together since we do NOT have the original birth certificate to compare it to. You’re entire article just shows how incredibly threatened you are by the truth when you have to just throw stupid shit in the air that makes no sense.

    • RoadScholar

      If FRAUD has been proven, why isn’t it being prosecuted? I’ll tell you why: BECAUSE IT HASN’T. It’s political theater. There is nothing wrong with any of the documents, and BHO is a perfectly eligible natural born citizen.

      And, might I say, gullible scum like you calling Squeeky an asshole is the funniest thing I’ve seen all week. You are a laughing-stock, an utter fool, and we find you hilariously stupid.

    • Andy

      You say that the document has been proven a forgery, but at this point in time it’s a random group of volunteers with no investigative training or expertise in vital statistics vs. a state’s department that deals with vital statistics.

      Who are you going to believe: people with no expertise, or people with the sole expertise about the material? It’s your choice. (I have a feeling you’ll choose door number 1, but that’s your right. We have no prohibitions on stupidity in the United States.)

  • Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter

    Hi Mitchina!!!

    OMG, did you ever miss the point of DEFINING FORGERY. Are you on The Cold Case Posse???

    Forgery doesn’t take place in a vacuum. It consists of specific acts done for specific purposes. To have it, you have to have either a FALSE creation, or a material alteration of a genuine document, with the intent to defraud somebody for some benefit.

    Like you, the ASININE Cold Case Posse thinks they can make the alpha and omega of forgery the simple act of stating some document was altered. Sorry for you, but anybody can piece together whatever they want, and unless those elements above are met, IT AIN’T FORGERY!!!

    The Frank Marshall Davis stuff was provided as an explanation for people like you who don’t have a clue what they are jabbering about. I never said the CCP brought it up.

    I suggest that you re-read the Internet Article a few times until you understand what it is about. I know that it must be emotionally painful for you to confront the awful reality that the CCP and Corsi haven’t proven, or even adequately alleged, that any information on the long form image is false, or altered.

    But hey, that is REALITY. Learn to live with it.

    Squeeky Fromm
    Girl Reporter

    • Mitchina

      “…you have to have either a FALSE creation, or a material alteration of a genuine document.” My whole point is that you CANNOT HAVE an original document (that being an original long form provided by the state of Hawaii that is really a forgery) with so many alterations, period. An original Long Form produced would NOT HAVE THESE THINGS – so yes, there was intent to present a document NOT as an original. And being unable to have the original birth certificate to compare it to – you nor I would ever know what was truly altered – we (being the smart people) know it was altered and for what reason? Possible scrivener’s error? Right, you need an affidavit for those.

      The long form provided was proven as altered by forensics as not an original long form. So do you really think long forms are produced in this manner typically? All pieced together? You, my dear, are the insane one for thinking you make any sense. And it’s typical of you Alinsky nuts to throw things out there that have nothing to do with your point – you do it for a reason – to discredit anyone you are talking about or to… and you were talking about Arpiao and there was no differential between people you hate (which would be us smart people) and Arpaio. This is how you IMPLY shit all the time to condemn and discredit others. No matter how you slice it – it was unnecessary and only added a “hate” factor to your diatribe. Just like you freakin left wing nuts to re-write the meanings of words to wrap around a false argument. There is not argument here. The long form was intentionally created as a false document – they don’t come this way otherwise – which means there was possible fraud committed – and we know why – which would lead right the f back to your Marxist White House people. AND YOU KNOW IT. That is why freaks like you are fighting a false argument so fiercely… and without making sense I might add.

      • Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter

        Alterations, in and of themselves, mean nothing unless they fit into the elements of a crime of forgery. Suppose somebody at the White House scanned the long form, then made it more readable by darkening some of the words, or moving a signature down to the open space of the block if it overlapped the lines???

        Would that be a “forgery.” Clearly not. There is no intent to defraud, and no benefit to be obtained. Yet you would have all the artifacts of alteration.

        That is the point you “smart” Birthers don’t get. Crimes have elements, each of which must be proved in a court of law beyond a reasonable doubt. And Birthers don’t have much of a track record on legal issues. Sooo, while you blame Alinsky for making you look ridiculous, it is really something that you Birthers have done all by yourselves.

        Take the test. Answer the questions I asked. And when you can’t provide any of those answers, there will be the sound of crickets. Crickets mean “Not Guilty.”

        If you doubt this, here is a link to some Connecticut criminal jury instructions which show the different elements for forgeries and others crimes at various levels. Each state and the Feds, have some variation of this kind of stuff.

        if you read these, what you will notice is how detailed the elements are, and the required stuff that goes along with each element to turn it into a crime. Usually, the intent to defraud, but it often goes deeper into the very nature of the document or the type of benefit sought.

        The very fact that a WRITTEN document is usually required should clue you into how totally screwed up Arpaio and the CCP are for even trying to make these claims over an IMAGE put on the Internet.

        Squeeky Fromm
        Girl Reporter

        • Mitchina

          I read the first 10 words – and if you are stupid enough not to know that any other gvt document provided to ANYONE does not have alterations, then I cannot help understand fundamental common sense – you have none. The long form was fraudulently altered, by doing so it makes it fraud and it wasn’t done “just because” or by accident but an intentional act and not one that is a good act. Dumb, Dumb, Dumb. I think the world has been brainwashed by attorneys and legal bullshit reasoning – common sense no longer exists.

          And no one has ever been claimed as “guilty” for this, dumb ass. NO ONE, but someone IS and the original birth certificate would prove this – not who it is but THAT SOMEONE IS. You are arguing a NON argument.

        • Mitchina

          You say, and rightfully so:

          “Legally, any erroneous information would have to have been put in, or altered, with the intent to defraud, so that simple clerical errors or harmless mistakes would not constitute forgery.”

          “the intent to defraud somebody would have to be proven.’

          So, show me the original birth certificate and we will find out exactly the material altered constituting fraud. First answer this question; What reason would there be for a government issued document to have been severely altered?

          Here, this may help you STFU: “Obama’s lawyer, Alexandra Hill, admitted that the image of Obama’s birth certificate was a forgery and made the absurd claim that, therefore, it cannot be used as evidence to confirm his lack of natural born citizenship status.”

          And here’s something else, the definition of forgery: ‘The creation of a false written document or alteration of a genuine one, with the intent to defraud.”

          You are a dumb ass.

        • Mitchina

          “U.S. District Court Judge Reggie Walton “held today that political appointees appointed by President Obama did interfere with the Department of Justice’s prosecution of the New Black Panther Party.”

          noooooo, they would NEVER intentionally alter a birth certificate to get what they want… never. You are still a dumb ass.

        • Mitchina

          Here is some more news for the dumbass “girl” who thinks she’s so liberally smart.

          Posted on Post & Email-by John Charlton-On December 12, 2009:

          “After 12 months of investigating the truth behind the lies which are Obama’s public persona, citizens should investigate the connections and players in the campaign of misinformation waged by Obama supporters during the 2008 Election.

          The results won’t be surprising, but the evidence should be gathered.

          One such case involved the charge of falsehood leveled against the professional journalist, David Pipes. Pipes had published an article entitled, “Was Barack Obama a Muslim?” on Christmas eve of 2007.

          In response, Media Matters for America attacked him, charging him with publishing falsehoods. Pipes responded in an article entitled, “Confirmed: Barack Obama Practised Islam” on Jan. 7, 2008.

          Media Matters for America claims to be an organization dedicated to exposing and correcting errors promoted by the media which serve the conservative agenda. Evidently the 501©(3) non-profit is not concerned with errors promoted by the media which serve the liberal agenda — but that is another story.

          Pipes in his Jan. 7th piece successfully rebutted the charge leveled against him.

          But the story here is who is behind Media Matters for America, and why were they so sensitive to the issue?

          According to Wikipedia, the New York Times reported that Media Matters for America was financed in March of 2004 by a group of wealthy liberals, with help from the newly formed Center for American Progress.

          The Center for “American” Progress

          The Center for American Progress, according to the same online “encyclopedia,” was founded in 2003, and is secretive about its sources of funding, for good reason. According to Wikipedia:

          The Center has no information on its website about its funding, but the Washington Post reported that “seed money pledged by such deep-pocketed Democrats as financier George Soros (and mortgage billionaires Herbert and Marion Sandler)” assisted its formation.[8] The authors of Her Way, a biography of Hillary Clinton, also assert that the Democracy Alliance, a progressive donors collective, has funded the Center. They also assert that the Sandlers and Soros provided seed money.[9]

          So as early as late 2003, it can be surmised that George Soros was preparing the Obama campaign, and creating and funding organizations which would serve in the information war to spread disinformation.

          The Center for American Progress has a multicultural staff. According to Wikipedia one of its major projects is publishing,

          … a daily email newsletter entitled The Progress Report, which is a recap and analysis of major political news in the United States, providing a progressive perspective on the day’s stories. The authors are Faiz Shakir, Amanda Terkel, Satyam Khanna, Matthew Corley, Ali Frick, and Benjamin Armbruster.

          Another principal project of the Soros funded organization is pushing the Global Warming agenda, by means of publishing,

          a daily global warming blog called Climate Progress. Edited by climate and energy expert Joseph J. Romm, the blog discusses climate science, climate technology solutions and political news related to climate change. It is a project of the Center for American Progress Action Fund. In April 2008, TIME magazine named this blog one of the “Top 15 Green Websites”, writing that it “counters bad science and inane rhetoric with original analysis delivered sharply…. Romm occupies the intersection of climate science, economics and policy…. On his blog and in his most recent book, Hell and High Water, you can find some of the most cogent, memorable, and deployable arguments for immediate and overwhelming action to confront global warming.”[11] In March 2009, Thomas L. Friedman, in his column in The New York Times, called the blog “indispensable”.[12]

          The third major project of Center for American Progress is to create and promote the modern equivalent of the communist student organization from the 60′s, the Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). The project is advanced with the name, “Campus progress,” and has the following purpose according to Wikipedia:

          Campus Progress, launched in February 2005, is the Center for American Progress’s comprehensive effort to help young people make their voices heard on issues and to empower new generations of progressive leaders. Campus Progress is active on over 500 U.S. campuses and in communities across the United States.

          And Campus progress was an early bird on Obama promotion, according to the same article:

          The second annual conference, held on July 12, 2006, in Washington, featured Senator Barack Obama, and was attended by over 1000 students from 48 states.

          It just goes to show you that the Socialists were planing and working for years for the Obama revolution, and that all that grassroots ground-swell for Obama in 2008, was merely carefully planned and engineered foreign influence funded by the Greek socialist, billionaire, George Soros.

          But let’s not forget Think Progress!

          Last, but not least, the Center for American Progress editor, Faiz Shakir publishes a blog called Think Progress, according to Wikipedia. Think Progress is one of the most influential pro-Obama sites on the internet, implicated as the origin of much of the propaganda pushed by Obama’s internet “helpers,” who are rather the modern equivalent of Hilter’s Brown Shirts, since they operate on fora all over the net to harrass, insult, demean, and otherwise badger American citizens who would dare think about what Obama is saying, and conclude with facts and evidence, that he is full of it.

          The site, which is run by a Victor Zapanta, was the first to put out that the Kerchner Advertorial had “racial undertones.” Following their lead, Obama supporters round the net and in Washington, D.C., began the campaign against the Kerchner Advertorial. It was during that time that The Post & Email’s website was also hacked as has been reported. (For more reports on the Advertorial click here)

          The charge that the Advertorial had “racial undertones” was a clear sign that Think Progress has a deeply seated, racial bias; for in some manner they psychologically connect chimpanzees with Obama, even though in the ad no such association exists. In this way the liberals show that they are the intellectual heirs of 19th century racists, whose hatred guides their perception of reality.

          The participation of Think Progress in the attack on the Kerchner Advertorial is, thus, a crucial piece of evidence showing that in all probability, the White House itself gave the command to attack the Washington Times on account of the ad.

          Discover the Networks, run by David Horowitz, a former leftist, now one of the far-left’s worst critics, published a detailed exposé of the Center for American Progress and Think Progress. It is a must read to understand whose behind Obama.

          The Power & Money behind the Misinformation Campaign

          Today the Center for American progress, whose president is John Podesta, the former White House Chief of Staff under Clinton, is heavily funded, still, by Soros and company; according to Wikipedia:

          From 2003 to 2007, the center received about $15 million in grants from 58 foundations. Major individual donors include George Soros, Peter Lewis, Steve Bing, and Herb and Marion Sandler.

          If you trace the liberal roots further, you will find that the billionaire, Peter Lewis is the President and CEO of Progressive Insurance, whose TV ads are famous.

          Steve Bing is the founder of Shangri-La Business Group; at 18 he inherited $600 million from his father who made a killing in NY realestate. He wrote the screen play, “Missing in Action” in which Chuck Norris starred. But his importance to the Democrats is that he is one of their biggest consistent donors, having contributed tens of millions of dollars to their poltiical efforts in the last decade.

          Herb Sandler created Golden West Financial Corporation and subsequently sold its assents to Wachovia Bank for $24 billion; his take was $2.4 billion. He is a heavy funder of strategic Democratic political organizations.

          So the next time you hear that Obama was “the peoples’ choice”, ask, “Which people?”

          Appendix: A Geography of Obot Land

          Here is a brief listing of sites collaborating in Soros’ misinformation campaign. Mind you, don’t let yourself be trapped dialoging with these guys: truth is their enemy; pyschological warfare and misinformation dissemination is their profession.

          I do believe this is totally desribing you, little girl!


          Oh, For Goodness Sake:

          Via OFGS – Jack Ryan’s “Birther Lawsuits”

          BadFiction: – this guy is an IT specialist and a member of the Society for Creative Revisionism — oops! — Anachronism

          BadFiction’s Birther Calender

          Obama Conspiracy Theories

          What’s Your Evidence:



          Native and Natural Born Citizenship Explored:

          This guy began as claiming Obama was “native born” and when it was shown that that wasn’t good enough to be president, changed his tune but not his message.

          Crazy Internet People:


          The Shared Agendas of George Soros and Barack Obama!

          The Obama-Soros Connection!

          I. U.S.-based Marxists Subvert Friendly Regimes and Support Foreign Terrorist OrganizationsI-Posted

          II. Obama, Clinton, Piven, Ayers, Dohrn and Soros behind Middle East Meltdown!

          III. You wouldn’t expect George Soros’ tentacles here, or would you? ‘Group promoting ‘peace’ in Middle East tied to Occupy, MoveOn, ACORN, more!

          IV. Soros fingerprints on Mideast chaos: ‘Billionaire tied to opposition leader, funded groups opposing U.S. allies

          V. Video: Socialists Explain How They Worked With Muslim Brotherhood In Egypt!

          VI. Obama’s relationships: much more than guilt by association!

          White Reds Exploiting Blacks: The Weather Underground, Barack Obama, and the Fundamental Transformation of the United States!

          The Vetting: ‘Obama, Radical Islam and the Soros Connection’!

          Godfather of The Islamic Revolution!

          Is President Obama in on the Uprising in Egypt?

          Is President Obama inciting riots across the US?

          Who or What Was Behind the Financial Crisis?

          Massive Voter Fraud-Again!

          The Greatest Fraud Perpetrated in American History!

          Who owns our supposedly fair and balanced airwaves and news outlets?

          Is it important to understand the Marxist assault on the foundations of our system?

          Is History Repeating Itself?

          The Fightin Side of Me!

          “Food For Thought”

          God Bless The USA!

          Semper Fi!, dumb ass

        • Slartibartfast

          Squeeky said:

          The very fact that a WRITTEN document is usually required should clue you into how totally screwed up Arpaio and the CCP are for even trying to make these claims over an IMAGE put on the Internet.

          That’s a very good point, but it is even worse than that. The birthers seem to think that there is a paper document that should be the ultimate authority, but the actual Hawai’ian vital records are data in the files of the DoH. The only data that is significant to eligibility is the date (more than 35 years before he took office) and location (inside the US or its territories) which have been repeatedly verified by the only agency with the authority to certify someone as born in Hawai’i. The pdf forgery claims are an apt example of a tale told by an idiot, full of sound and fury, signifying nought.

      • Andy


        With your expertise, which items were changed from the original record? Can you provide any evidence of any changes?

        You seem to think that the entire document was created from whole cloth, but the originator of the document (Hawaii’s DOH) has stated it wasn’t. Do you have any evidence to impugn their statement?

  • Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter

    Mithchina: You said:

    The long form was fraudulently altered, by doing so it makes it fraud and it wasn’t done “just because” or by accident but an intentional act and not one that is a good act.”

    Like most every other Birther, when somebody catches you, you just go make up some Birfer Law. Try actually reading more than 10 words and you might understand this stuff, to wit:

    The ALTERATION and the INTENT TO DEFRAUD are TWO DIFFERENT THINGS. Alteration, all by itself, IS NOT fraud. Any fraud arises from how someone actually uses the altered document, and must be proved along with the alteration to make forgery.

    Let’s do this mathematically for all the Smart Birthers out there:

    TRUE: Alteration + Intent to defraud = forgery

    FALSE: Alteration = Intent To Defraud – BECAUSE this leads to the FALSE conclusion of: Alteration = Forgery

    This is what makes Arpaio, Zullo, Corsi, and you sooo completely and totally out of touch with reality. If alteration was complete proof of intent, the laws would simply say that. The laws would not have that “intent to defraud” language in there. They wouldn’t need it. Alteration alone would be enough.

    There may be no good reason for you personally to know about this if you aren’t a lawyer, cop, or sheriff. But there is NO EXCUSE for Arpaio, the CCP, and Corsi not knowing it.

    Please quit trying to just win an argument,and actually read some of this stuff. It isn’t hard, and it will make you into a smarter person.

    Squeeky Fromm
    Girl Reporter

    • Mitchina

      lol… right… so a totally altered document wasn’t done intentionally. I am not in court – and neither is Arpaio – we just know BULLSHIT when we smell it and apparently you like parsing the scent to your own liking. This give cause for more investigation – provide the original birth certificate and end the entire CONJECTED argument. But people like you will never provide proof even after there is OBVIOUS FRAUD being attempted here.

      This is why I hate lawyers – you all think you know so much when in fact all you do is fuck things up more, hide the truth of everything and smile while you’re doing it. It is common sense what the potential is here to most of us, just not you. continue on being all “la-la-la-la” with your fingers in your ears and your common sense up your butt.

      • Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter

        I am not a lawyer. But I do help my BFF Fabia Sheen, Esq., a lawyer a whole lot at her office. Most of this stuff is pretty simple to understand if you read up on it and listen to people who know what they are talking about, even if you think you disagree with their politics.

        As far as the POTENTIAL here, I used to be a common sense suspicious Birther, (but NEVER a two citizen parent Birther) sooo I have never seen a phony birth certificate as something that required a huge conspiracy to pull off. That being said, I have also not seen any convincing evidence come out of the CCP or anybody else that the long form is fake.

        When the image came out in April 2011, I thought that the image was manipulated some, and probably on purpose, to keep the Birther issue alive. Obama needs rabid, paranoid Birthers to give his supporters something to get enthusiastic about. I am just not going to play his game.

        The truth is what the truth is, and with Hawaii backing up the document, the chances of it being a phony are not impossible, but highly, highly improbable in my opinion. Such a small chance that I don’t stay awake at night worrying about it.

        On top of that, the laws regarding forgery are pretty similar, and I do not see any evidence that would support a claim of forgery. Sooo, I just call stuff like I see it.

        Squeeky Fromm
        Girl Reporter

  • David Farrar

    202 205-0602
    Department of Health and Human Services

    Office of Inspector General



    To provide an update on the nature and extent of birth certificate fraud.

    FINDINGS : “A certified copy of a birth certificate is proof only that a birth occurred and was recorded.”

    All other information contained in a state certified birth certificate has to be proven the old fashioned way: by a preponderance of evidence.

    To date, try as I might; I cannot find one, single, solitary, independent* corroborative piece of evidence that would support Barack Obama birth narrative. Have you?

    ex animo
    * independent of Hawaiian Health Department records

    • Slartibartfast


      Try as you might, you have been unable to find a single, solitary piece of credible evidence that casts doubt on President Obama birth narrative–that’s not my opinion, it’s Judge Malihi’s. On the other hand, we have the newspaper announcements, Dr. West telling his niece about Stanley having a baby, Stig W’s mom recalling a black baby in the nursery with her son, the US State Department finding that President Obama was a natural born citizen in an inquiry regarding his father, Kapiolani Hospital using President Obama’s letter about being born there in their promotional materials, Governor Abercrombie’s recollections of meeting President Obama, and I could probably come up with more (like the numbering on the known contemporaneous birth certificates being consistent with President Obama’s BC being alphabetized in a monthly batch with other babies born at Kapiolani). If your standard is truly preponderance of the evidence (or any other reasonable standard), then you have your answer and you should drop your frivolous lawsuit, but I suspect that you will display your lack of integrity by moving the goalposts once again. Are you man enough to admit that you were wrong? Or are you going to demonstrate that what you just said was a lie?


      Welcome back!

  • The European

    Squeeky, has your blog been hijacked ?


    Your European

    • Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter

      No. I approved the comment. I am not sure what all of Mitchina’s links have to do with a discussion of forgery, but sometimes it is just fun to watch the Birthers run around in circles dissembling. I see it as a variation of the old jingle about “When in trouble, when in doubt. . .” to wit:

      Whenever Squeeky
      Busts you out,
      Talk in circles
      Logic flout.

      Tee Hee! Tee Hee!

      Squeeky Fromm
      Girl Reporter

  • John Wayne

    A federal court in Washington, DC, held last week that political appointees appointed by President Obama did interfere with the Department of Justice’s prosecution of the New Black Panther Party.
    The ruling came as part of a motion by the conservative legal watch dog group Judicial Watch, who had sued the DOJ in federal court to enforce a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for documents pertaining to the the New Black Panthers case. Judicial Watch had secured many previously unavailable documents through their suit against DOJ and were now suing for attorneys’ fees.
    Obama’s DOJ had claimed Judicial Watch was not entitled to attorney’s fees since “none of the records produced in this litigation evidenced any political interference whatsoever in” how the DOJ handled the New Black Panther Party case. But United States District Court Judge Reggie Walton disagreed. Citing a “series of emails” between Obama political appointees and career Justice lawyers, Walton writes:
    The documents reveal that political appointees within DOJ were conferring about the status and resolution of the New Black Panther Party case in the days preceding the DOJ’s dismissal of claims in that case, which would appear to contradict Assistant Attorney General Perez’s testimony that political leadership was not involved in that decision. Surely the public has an interest in documents that cast doubt on the accuracy of government officials’ representations regarding the possible politicization of agency decision-making.

    In sum, the Court concludes that three of the four fee entitlement factors weigh in favor of awarding fees to Judicial Watch. Therefore, Judicial Watch is both eligible and entitled to fees and costs, and the Court must now consider the reasonableness of Judicial Watch’s requested award.

    • RoadScholar

      O boy, you will believe anything, won’t you? The Obama administration didn’t have the chance to interfere with the New Black Panther Party investigation, because the allegations were investigated by Justice when BUSH WAS IN OFFICE; they found no prosecutable misconduct, and the matter was dropped BEFORE BHO WAS INAUGURATED.

      Got that? You are lying. The fact that it is because you were lied TO doesn’t make it any better. It’s a LIE. Your hallucinated delusion that BHO supports black radicals is a LIE. Virtually everything you think you know about the President is a LIE. Got that? Posterity will bear this out. It will look back and say “The Obama Smear Machine Lynch Mob was so well-funded, so successful, that it had millions of Americans totally convinced of absolute and utter hogwash.”

    • RoadScholar

      Phony scandal relentlessly hyped by Fox News.

      “…In fact, it was the Bush administration, not the Obama administration, that decided not to prosecute the NBPP criminally for an incident in which an NBPP member carried a nightstick outside a Philadelphia polling place. The Bush administration chose to file a civil case in the matter instead.

      Furthermore, conservatives including to the Republican vice chair of the Civil Rights Commission investigating the case have agreed that the attacks against the Justice Department are meritless.
      Moreover, the DOJ’s ethics office found that senior career lawyers at the DOJ “did not commit professional misconduct or exercise poor judgment, but rather acted appropriately” in their handling of the NBPP case.”

    • Monkey Boy

      The hitherto unheard of NBP party are false-flaggers funded by Republican dirty tricksters. The politicized Bush Justice Dept. didn’t prosecute them, partly because they would have been prosecuting the party’s undercover operatives, and partly because they (the NBP) were careful not to commit any felonious actions.

      I challenge you to produce anyone that was stopped from voting by those idiots play acting and trying to embarrass candidate Obama–just like the woman that carved the backward ‘B’ on her face.

  • John Wayne


  • John Wayne


    A federal court in Washington, DC, held last week that political appointees appointed by President Obama did interfere with the Department of Justice’s prosecution of the New Black Panther Party

  • insomnia

    Mitchina keeps going on about the long form being a forgery – what is her opinion on the regular birth certificate – the COLB that was issued first? All the information is the same in both. The CCP has never discussed it either. Is that one a forgery too?
    Mitchina – what is your reasoning for thinking the COLB is a forgery?

  • G

    Excellent article and cogent analysis, Squeeky! It’s great to have you back! 🙂 As always, some very deserved KUDOS to you…

    On the other hand, the irrational spittle-inflected rage from the delusional Birther crowd is as pathetic and predictably moronic as always…

    • Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter

      Thank you G!!!

      The Birthers seem to be hung up on a simplistic “Alteration = Forgery” analysis. What part of An underlying intent to defraud, based on knowledge of the false nature of the instrument, must accompany the act” don’t they get.

      But then again, they always stumble over the easy things.

      Squeeky Fromm
      Girl Reporter

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: