Well, I sure feel like Mr. Beatty in the above cartoon. I have gone out and bought a moose, and come to find out it is really just an old nag with fake antlers. Yesterday, I published an Internet Article with what was purported to be Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.’s Order in her Indiana case, and come to find out, it is NOT the real thing after all. That is what I get for trying to win a Pulitzer. Here is a copy of the Order I published:
Here is a pdf of the very clever forgery:
Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq. was kind enough to come by here and point out that this wasn’t her work. I can understand her chagrin and concern that people would confuse this with her work.
She even ran her own Internet Article about this, which I screen-shotted:
Dr. Taitz is right to be concerned that people could mistake this for her Order. I understand her anxiety. Whoever the forger is, they were very good at their art, and they copied so many aspects of Dr. Taitz’s style and mannerisms, that it is easy to see how this could pass for her work. Nevertheless, I still feel like a complete “Gull E. Bull.”
Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter
Note 1. The Image. This is a cartoon from Jame’s Thurber’s 1931 book, The Owl in the Attic and Other Perplexities. My father had a book with these cartoons in it, and he used to read the cartoons to me when I was little. I remember giggling insanely. I was trying to find one about William The Trance Dog last night for another Internet Article I am working on, but it was very difficult since I could not even remember who the author was. Finally, I found it, and the Moose cartoon above, at this really cool blog:
http://downwithtyranny.blogspot.com/
I will try to work some more of Thurber’s cartoons into future Internet Articles.
Note 2. Lathers and Mousses and Mooses. Well, these are word plays, some in French. The idiom “in a lather” means to be very anxious about something. The French word for lather or foam is “Mousse.” Which is pronounced as “moose” which leads to the Image of a fake moose, and the caption, “This is not a mousse.” Which is a play on C’est ne pas une pipe from Magritte’s Treachery of Images, about which you can read at Wiki:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Treachery_of_Images
Note 3. Don’t Buy A Moose In A Poke. A play on the idiom ” don’t buy a pig in a poke.” About which Wiki says:
The idioms pig in a poke and sell a pup (or buy a pup) refer to a confidence trick originating in the Late Middle Ages, when meat was scarce, but cats and dogs (puppies) were not.
A poke is a sack or bag. It has a French origin as ‘poque’ and, like several other French words, its diminutive is formed by adding ‘ette’ or ‘et’ – hence ‘pocket’ began life with the meaning ‘small bag’. Poke is still in use in several English-speaking countries, notably Scotland and the USA, and describes just the sort of bag that would be useful for carrying a piglet to market.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pig_in_a_poke
And, a poke is “to jab or prod, or stir (a fire) with a poker to make it burn more fiercely. Which someone was doing a little poking when they created the phony Order. OH, sometimes it ain’t easy being an INTP.
August 13th, 2012 at 12:29 pm
Well, at least Orly knows the difference between posting a nonsense fake proposed order and posting a genuine nonsense proposed order.
August 13th, 2012 at 12:30 pm
Oh, and I don’t think I’ve told you lately how much I missed you…
August 13th, 2012 at 12:33 pm
Hi DaveB:
Tee Hee! Oh, I sure am feeling silly for having fallen for the prank. I guess I was just “Pwned”. And thank you for missing me!!!
Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter
August 13th, 2012 at 1:09 pm
Whew!! I’m glad she cleared that up. I had accepted it as genuine as well.
But I just say, in my defense, I sent the pdf to my expert, who sells office supplies to legal firms, and he assured me it was legit. I feel so silly. He’s going to get an earful.
August 13th, 2012 at 1:13 pm
LOL!!! I wonder how the forger got a hold of her stationery??? Plus, I was reading her site, and she called me “one of the nastiest Obots.” Was that a dig???
Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter
August 13th, 2012 at 1:55 pm
Did she say that about you, or about “Squeky Frum”?
August 13th, 2012 at 2:26 pm
I think we are supposed to be the same person. But she has given me an idea on how I can hide my identity when I don’t want somebody to know it’s me. I will just disguise myself as:
Squeky Frum
Nasty Obot
August 13th, 2012 at 4:36 pm
I knew it wasn’t Orly. How?
It was fun to read.
Everything Orly writes is humourless, bordering on Kafka-esque (a word I deplore, but I couldn’t think of a better one). Also, the author almost tipped her hand and wrote “agency appeal thingy.”
August 13th, 2012 at 4:47 pm
LOL!!! Looking back on it, the Happy Tooth maybe should have tipped me off. I mean, how likely is it that Taitz would use her office stationery??? I mean, she wouldn’t ever do something like that, would she??? Or start each item with “Dr. Orly Taitz, Esq.” would she??? Or mis-spell “Plaintiffs”???
Maybe the author was just trying to stay on the safe side of parody???
Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter
August 13th, 2012 at 5:19 pm
I dunno. People still have questions about this. Know what I mean?
August 13th, 2012 at 7:39 pm
True, Dave.
Today she posted her FedEx receipts stating that she’d mailed her Proposed Order to the Clerk of the Count in IN. She did not, however, post the Proposed Order, so now we really don’t know whether it was real or not.
Well, except that the Proposed Order weighed .55 (a little over 1/2) pounds. WTF? LOL Only Orly could propose a simple 5-6 page Order that weights over half a pound.
Now, in her defense, perhaps she included her new Amended Complaint, which would account for the weight… maybe. But she didn’t state so, so I’m guessing it’s just the Proposed Order, in which case it must be a doozie!!
It it her first attempt. But even with 50 attempt it would still be wrong.
August 13th, 2012 at 9:45 pm
Realist:
You are right. There is way too much weight for an Order. I figured she never did one before and OMG!!! I can’t wait to see what she put together. 50-50 the Judge kicks it back on her. maybe even 60-40.
Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter
August 13th, 2012 at 9:02 pm
Orly may be embarrassed and denying that you got the scoop on the proposed Order. Until I see it proved false by authorities (yes, more than one is necessary) on fake pdf’s, I’m holding out on declaring the scoop is poop.
August 14th, 2012 at 2:06 am
Squeeky
That was very unprofessional of you to print an unverified document; I’m sure that it caused no harm because it didn’t ridicule Dr. Taitz, esq, realtor, wife and mother. But, if by chance, it had been stupid, it might have defamed Orly Taitz, esq., etc.
Imagine if Dr. Taitz, esq., etc., printed something defamatory about someone prominent that was pure speculation and unproven? You Obots would be demanding that she face the jilatine(sic).
August 14th, 2012 at 11:35 am
You are braindead Obot and stupid. Dr Taitz would never use her dentist stationary to write court papers. Dr Taitz, esq, wife, mother, and scourge of traders, will hold you accountable for this defame.
August 14th, 2012 at 12:31 pm
Hey, fool me once, shame on me.
August 14th, 2012 at 12:31 pm
I mean, we won’t get fooled again!
August 14th, 2012 at 1:09 pm
I have heard Orly called many things but “scourge of traders” is a new one. 😆
August 14th, 2012 at 5:51 pm
Sqeky Foam, you have committed a gross calummy against a wondrous Patriot. By publishing a PURLOINED DOCUMENT that you had no authority to even SEE, let alone BROADCAST, you have caused much pain and suffering.
I, therefore, challenge you to a round of fistingcuffs on the steps of the Illinois–no wait–Indiana state house. Should you decline due to the frialties of your gender, I propose a duel with 44 magnum revolvers across a hankerchief instead.
Treason must not go unpunished.
August 14th, 2012 at 6:02 pm
Hi Leonard!!!
How about we meet behind CDR Kerchner’s Honey Wagon instead??? You get there first, and I’ll be right behind you. Just ignore the sound of any cranks turning, OK???
Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter