Doctor WTF??? (Or, The American Doctor Who)

Deputy Zullo Demanded The Doctor Tell His Children That Obama Would Become President In Five Years

Well, isn’t this something???  Deputy Mike Zullo of the Cold Case Posse done gone and used  his head as something besides a Stetson holder.  And you have to give him credit for thinking out of the box. He agrees that something is fishy with Obama’s long form birth certificate, because Dr. Sinclair never told his own children that he delivered the President.

I actually listened to the following link, and it is  pretty interesting if you like this kind of stuff.  Here is the timeline on the audio. Rick Wiles is the interviewer. If you like scary religious Anti-Christ stuff, and hearing about visions of Mt. Fuji erupting, then you can start at the beginning.  But if you want to skip all that and go straight to the Mike Zullo interview, then go to the 12:10 mark. If you want to skip right to the Dr. Sinclair stuff, then go to the 34:00 mark.

http://www.trunews.com/Audio/9_6_12_thursday_trunews2.mp3

Here is what transpired, by my transcription:

Rick Wyles starts it off with this question: “What about the doctor that allegedly signed the birth certificate? You know, after the electronic file was posted on the White House website, the adult grown children of that doctor, who has passed away, said “We didn’t know dad delivered the President of the United States, he never told us.”

Mike Zullo: Well, and that’s true. And because we don’t think that happened either. You know, every signature on that document looks like it was lifted off of another one.

I gave you the audio timeline above. Now here is the Reality Timeline:

1961 –   Dr. David Sinclair signs the Obama long form birth certificate.

2003 – Dr. David Sinclair dies.

2004 – Obama is elected U.S. Senator

2008 – Obama is elected President.

Can anybody figure out why Dr. Sinclair may not have told his children he delivered the President??? Is there any intervening cause that might explain his reluctance to discuss this with his children??? I mean to me, the answer is pretty obvious, but what do Birthers think, that maybe Dr. Sinclair faked his own death and his children are in on it??? Because unless he did fake it, the only other answer is that Dr. Sinclair can zip around in time like Doctor Who.

To be fair to Deputy Zullo, it was Rick Wiles who asked the stupid question. But Zullo has supposedly lived and breathed this case for over a year now. Surely a semi-competent investigator would know the timeline well enough to have given the correct answer, “Well, Rick, actually Dr. Sinclair died several years before Obama became President.” I am not expecting Zullo to have the hour and minute of Sinclair’s death in his head, but surely it is not asking too much to know there was a 5 year gap.

But playing along with the Wiles and Zullo Show, wouldn’t this have been a great follow-up question by somebody calling in:

Anonymous Caller: Well, Deputy Zullo, why didn’t you and the Cold Case Posse take Dr. Sinclair into custody back in 2003, before he died??? This witness could have blown the whole thing wide open!!!

I would love to hear the answer to that one, and why this scene below DID NOT happen:

The Cold Case Posse Attempted To Arrest The Doctor For Illegal Clockfighting

My advice to Zullo – – – “Whatever you do, DON’T THINK!

Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter

Note 1. The Image. This is from the 1966 episode of Doctor Who called, The Gunfighters. Some call this the worst Doctor Who episode ever, while others see it in a different light. Coincidentally, it takes place in ARIZONA. There is some identity confusion going on. And, Doctor Who meets Doc Holliday, a dual-professional who had both a Dental and a Gunfighter license. (Having practiced his craft before many bars in many states.) There is even a dental scene in the episode:

He Quickly Regretted Quipping. . . I Hear You Have A Lot Of Pull In Tombstone, Doc Holliday.

Wiki has a lot to say about this episode:

The Gunfighters is the seventh serial of the third season in the British science fiction television series Doctor Who, set in 19th Century America on the days leading up to the famous Gunfight at the O.K. Corral. This serial was first broadcast in four weekly parts from 30 April to 21 May 1966 on BBC1.

In the frontier town of Tombstone, Arizona, the troublesome Clanton brothers, Ike, Phineas and Billy, are in town in search of Doc Holliday to settle an old score over the death of another brother called Reuben. They meet up with their hired hand Seth Harper at the Last Chance Saloon. He knows what Holliday looks like and describes his coat and demeanour. This is overheard by bar singer Kate, who lets her paramour Holliday know he is in danger.

The TARDIS has arrived in a nearby stable, with the Doctor in agony from toothache. He and his companions Steven Taylor and Dodo Chaplet, dressed as cowboys, soon encounter local marshal Wyatt Earp, who offers them his protection and warns them to keep their counsel. The Doctor finds the dentist – Holliday himself – while Dodo and Steven book rooms at the local hotel. There they are mocked by the Clantons, who suspect the Doctor they refer to is Holliday himself.

Spoilers! More at the links:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Gunfighters

and:

http://tardis.wikia.com/wiki/The_Gunfighters_(TV_story)

Note  2. “Whatever you do, DON’T THINK!” is a word play on the scariest Doctor Who episodes EVER:

Advertisements

About Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter

Hi!!! I am a Girl Reporter on the Internet. I am 31. Plus I am a INTP. I have a Major in Human Kinetics, and a Minor in English. I have 2 cats, and a new kitten! I write poetry, and plus I am trying to learn how to play guitar. I think that is all??? Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter View all posts by Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter

52 responses to “Doctor WTF??? (Or, The American Doctor Who)

  • G

    Agreed – “Don’t Blink”, which introduced us to the Weeping Angels, was one of the scariest Dr. Who episodes ever…

    • Squeeky Fromm, Girl Reporter

      G:

      Wasn’t it though? Those angels just scared the crap out of me, and I am not all that spooky. Now, I am not sure I could visit a Catholic Church or a graveyard without looking over my shoulder to keep the angels from sneaking up on me.

      Squeeky Fromm
      Girl Reporter

  • realist

    Obama elected president in 2005? 😉

  • Dave B.

    Zullo was just preoccupied with his search for the perfect duck.

  • davidfarrar

    How do you know Dr. Sinclair was the actual delivery physician?
    You don’t, not unless Obama releases is natal records.

    Dr.Sinclair must have had some records of the birth. Where are his medical records? If there were any records of Dr. Sinclair delivering Obama, he must have had some records. Isn’t it strange no one has even bothered to check to see whether Dr. Sinclair had any medical records with Obama’s birth.

    This is exactly what I am talking about…there has been absolutely no independent evidence to substantiate Obama’s Hawaiian Health Department records.

    ex animo
    davidfarrar

    • G

      Do you know the delivery physician of Mitt Romney and have his natal records too? Do you know those things for every previous president and presidential contender?

      I didn’t think so.

    • Monkey Boy

      David

      When you get your talking points, try to learn how to advance and defend them.

      Dr.Sinclair must have had some records of the birth. Where are his medical records? If there were any records of Dr. Sinclair delivering Obama, he must have had some records. Isn’t it strange no one has even bothered to check to see whether Dr. Sinclair had any medical records with Obama’s birth.

      I challenge you to get and present YOUR hospital birth records as a proof of concept. No, you can’t? I know that–neither can diarrhea mouth, Trump.

      Prove me wrong. I dare you.

      • davidfarrar

        I am no running for the presidency.

        Secondly, Trump presented his Hospital birth certificate, as you well know.

        Lastly, while Mitt said it was just a joke; he did challenged Obama to a birth certificate showdown.

        If Obama didn’t have anything to hide, Obama should have called him out right then and there. He didn’t, of course, because Obama doesn’t have the evidence to back up his story, while both he and Mitt know, Mitt does.

        ex animo
        davidfarrar

        • Dave B.

          Why do you so entirely abandon your skepticism when it comes to Mr. Romney’s birth certificate, eh, David?

        • Monkey Boy

          SFB, or persistent liar, maybeprobably both.

          A souvenir BC that MIGHT have been from a hospital, or might have been printed up at an novelty shop on Times Square, doesn’t mean squat. Even an ignoramus like you knows that, you just choose to lie about it.

          Where are the actual hospital admittance forms and charts for Trump and/or you that you claim you are seeking from Obama? Of course, you and I both know you are lying. There is no chance that you will waste $400 or so on a fool’s errand.

          Sir, have you NO shame?

  • davidfarrar

    Dave B.

    Mitt has published his bc without anybody asking for it, while it took Obama four years to produce his, and he only did it then because he wet his pants when Trump called him out on the issue so much, he was forced to post a fake bc on his website…that’s why.

    ex animo
    davidfarrar

    • Dave B.

      Right, that’s it…

    • Dave B.

      You know, that was an entirely inadequate response to such a despicable canard. May I remind you that President Obama released, in a tangible form, the same kind of document that Mitt Romney released digitally, and did it over four years ago? David, you don’t deserve the slack I’ve cut you before.

    • Slartibartfast

      David “out of breath”,

      No one has ever verified Mittens’s BC while President Obama released his COLB before anyone had asked for it and it has been verified by the DoH under oath and in official statements. Why are you so keen on lying?

      • Monkey Boy

        Why are you so keen on lying?

        It’s compulsive, that’s why he is a birther. Although, it appears that he was an idiot (and probably a compulsive liar) before becoming birther.

      • davidfarrar

        So how do we arrange a birth certificate throwdown between Obama and Romney?

        The only thing I can think of that might do the trick is for Squeeky to use her unique web genius to do a parody of Bobby Flay’s Throwdown using Mitt’s and Barack’s long form birth certificates only. Fair enough? In order for Mitt to play, he must publish his long for birth certificate. After that, any independent evidence each candidate can bring to the table to substantiate their birth certificate claim will be counted as a point scored.

        ex animo
        davidfarrar

        • davidfarrar

          I’ll even give Obama odds. All Obama has to do is produce ONE, single, independent piece of evidence to independently substantiate his birth certificate, irrespective of how many Mitt produces, and he will win!

          Fair enough?

          ex animo
          davidfarrar

        • Monkey Boy

          Let’s see your hospital birth records. Show us it can be done.

          I would say that if you don’t, you have proven yourself a lying sod–but, that has been adequately proven time and time again.

  • Jim

    David Says: “All Obama has to do is produce ONE, single, independent piece of evidence to independently substantiate his birth certificate, ”

    Ok, the State of Hawaii.

    • davidfarrar

      I apologize, Jim,

      I usually put in the qualifier “independent” of the Hawaiian Health Department records.

      ex animo
      davidfarrar

      • Slartibartfast

        David “out of breath”,

        Why would you exclude the “gold standard” of verification? When you add in your exclusion of the confirmation of the Hawai’ian newspapers that G pointed out, it starts to become clear that you are unwilling to accept any reasonable standard—furthermore, your failure to hold Romney (or any previous candidate for the presidency) to the same standard reveals an enormous amount of hypocrisy on your part.

    • G

      The records of his birth in the 2 different HI newspapers also serve to independently substantiate it.

      Of course, David is just sticking his head in the sand and pretending that all real evidence doesn’t actually exist.

      And for him to proclaim “independent of the HI Health Department records” is laughable… when your entire argument is based on IGNORING the ONLY actual authority over said records…that’s a pathetic level of deep denial…

  • Jim

    OK, WND before they found out they could scam the rubes.

  • davidfarrar

    Excuse me, gentlemen;

    If you will check the record, I have posted exactly where you can find the present editor of one of the Hawaiian newspapers stating on video, CNN’s in fact, that their information, in both papers, came directly from the Hawaiian Health Department index records. They did not come from an independent source — IMU.

    ex animo
    davidfarrar

    • Monkey Boy

      WHERE ARE YOUR HOSPITAL RECORDS??? SHOW US IT CAN BE DONE!

    • Slartibartfast

      David “out of breath”,

      That doesn’t change the fact that you are asking for records which may not even exist, and, even if they do, are protected by law. You fine tune your requests to make sure that it is impossible for President Obama to comply, heedless of the fact that it would be impossible for any person to meet your demands (as well as the fact that you have no right to make such demands since President Obama has already far exceeded what was required of him in this regard—not to mention what any other candidate has produced in the history of our nation). Finally, you conveniently ignore (or are too stupid to realize), that the newspaper articles are proof that the president’s birth was filed immediately (rather than a late or delayed filing).

      Not only is there overwhelming evidence that President Obama was born in Hawai’i as well as a complete absence of a single piece of credible evidence that would impeach that assertion, but you and your ilk are unable to even come up with a logically consistent theory of how the evidence we have could have come to be if President Obama wasn’t born on August 4th, 1961 in Kapiolani Hospital.

      The only people that should pay any attention to you at all are judges and the only reason that they should consider you and your “evidence” is in order to asses the size of the fine to be levied against you. Face it David, you are a sniveling little liar who doesn’t deserve the responses you get from myself or others here, let alone merit the attention of anyone even remotely associated with the President of the United States—who, by the way, is a far better American and a far better person than you could ever hope to be. It’s a good thing you are too unaware to realize what a shameful bigot you are—otherwise you would probably need to leave the country to flee your disgrace. Any true American has nothing but contempt for you and your ilk (or the good fortune to be ignorant of your depraved existence).

      • Monkey Boy

        Face it David, you are a sniveling little liar who doesn’t deserve the responses you get from myself or others here, let alone merit the attention of anyone even remotely associated with the President of the United States—who, by the way, is a far better American and a far better person than you …

        Indeed, even Yulia is a better American–and more honest–than ex animal. Twinky_Ike? I don’t know.

    • Thomas Brown

      By an “independent source,” do you mean a source that ISN’T PART OF THE CONSPIRACY?

      And who exactly would that be?

    • Jim

      So basically, David, what you’re saying is that nobody in the US can prove where they were born because all state records are suspect. Sort of like you telling us that you can’t become President if you have dual citizenship then have North Korea declare every US citizen a citizen of North Korea and make everyone ineligible. Pretty senseless argument, isn’t it?

    • Northland10

      Funny, the Kapi’olani Foundation (the hospitals fundraising arm) still has their “Kapiʻolaniʼs Centennial Magazine – 100 Years of Caring for Children”which contains the congratulatory letter for the President who mentions “the place of my birth.”

      So he sends a letter claiming he was born there and the hospital publishes it. Neither the President or the Hospital are the state. This would be a third party.

  • davidfarrar

    But gentlemen,

    We already know the Haraiian Health Department has a birth index for one Barack H. Obama. It is these records we are trying to substantiate. Since the two newspaper announcements drew their information directly from the Hawaiian Health Deparemnt index, they don’t offer any independent proof of the event.

    As an example: If these newspaper announcements were placed by a third-party, say the proud grandmother of her first born grandson, as was originally claimed: yes, indeed; I think we could have driven a stake deep into the heart of this growing birther movement for good.

    ex animo
    davidfarrar

    • Monkey Boy

      HOW CAN YOUR CITIZENSHIP BE INDEPENDENTLY CORROBORATED? WHAT GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO QUESTION OUR PRESIDENT WHEN YOU CAN BE ILLEGAL WITH A BOGUS BC?

      PROVE THAT YOU HAVE THE RIGHT BY PROVIDING HOSPITAL BIRTH RECORDS, since state BVS are not enough.

    • Slartibartfast

      David “out of breath”,

      Wow, are you dumb.

    • RoadScholar

      David, you’re slipping into senility… or just plain silliness.

      “If these newspaper announcements were placed by a third-party, say the proud grandmother of her first born grandson, as was originally claimed: yes, indeed; I think we could have driven a stake deep into the heart of this growing birther movement for good.”

      BIRTHERS WOULD CLAIM SUCH AN ANNOUNCEMENT WOULD BE WORTHLESS. In fact, you clueless seditionists would claim she phoned it in to the newspaper from Kenya.

      That is the stupidest statement I have ever seen from you, which is one damn high bar to jump.

      • davidfarrar

        The point is, gentlemen,

        if there is no independent evidence to substantiate any of the information contained in Obama’s birth certificates, these documents have little, if any, probative value and must be set aside.

        ex animo
        davidfarrar

        • Slartibartfast

          David “out of breath”,

          Only in your fantasy world—in any US court of law they prima facie evidence which means that they must be treated as fact absent credible evidence to the contrary according to the US Constitution. Why don’t you respect the Constitution?

        • Monkey Boy

          Asshat

          Stop bloviating and present YOUR hospital birth records and prove that it’s possible.

          What’s the holdup?

        • Sudoku

          David,

          What would you consider independent evidence? Something everybody has, of course. What would that be? I have my birth certificate and a passport. But, of course, I got the passport with my birth certificate, so I guess that is out. I have a SSN and file taxes. Obama does, too, they are online the the SSA doesn’t have a problem with them. What else? Parents still alive? Mine are, but then they couldn’t be called independent. Obama’s parents are no longer living, so that is out. What about Gov. Abercrombie? He says he knew Obama’s parents. Does that count? What about the woman interviewed by CNN, the one who delivered in the same hospital at the same time as Obama’s mother? She remembers a black baby in the nursery because it was so unusual.

          If you could not rely on your birth certificate, passport, newpaper announcements, parents, etc., what would you use to prove up the details of your birth? Forget the hospital records. They do not keep those for over 50 years. What would you use?

        • G

          David, these are the DUMBEST arguments by far that you have spewed forth.

          Seriously, listen to yourself. Your entire argument now amounts to saying that OFFICIAL sources don’t count, nor does corroboration of those official sources…and that they only “evidence” you would accept is, what amounts to third-party hearsay.

          *facepalm* God, you are dumb. You truly live in a backwards universe that only exists within your own fevered mind… I swear, the mental contortions you go through to justify your personal xenophobic sense of bigotry is astounding…and so detatched from how the real world actually functions, that it should be considered not just a mental defect, but a clear mental illness.

  • davidfarrar

    Slartibartfast
    September 10th, 2012 at 9:03 pm

    We have prima facie evidence; that’s not the problem. Our problem is getting the judge to apply proper judicial notice of that evidence.

    I’ll give you just one example: the bio information written by his literary agent or some such thing.

    All we are trying to do is prove a truth. A good 20% to 25% of the voting public have some question about the qualifications of Obama. It would seem to me if Obama is every in a position to need a few extra votes, he would simply walk into court and present his credentials.

    ex animo
    davidfarrar

    • Dave B.

      There truly is no limit, is there?

    • Slartibartfast

      David “out of breath”,

      Where on the blurb that you are referring to does it say that it is prima facie evidence? Your ignorance and stupidity never cease to amaze me—do you think that whenever you run across a term that you don’t understand that you can just make up a definition? It doesn’t work like that. In any case, a bio written by a third party (and one who has admitted that she made a mistake, by the way) is a different kind of evidence—inadmissible hearsay.

      Just for completeness, your finial bit of idiocy assumes that any one of your fellow birther bigots (who I’m guessing are much smaller than the 20-25% you suggest) would ever vote for President Obama no matter what he does. Does it hurt to be as stupid as you? Seriously, I’m sure that today’s world has to be extremely scary and confusing for a narrow-minded and ignorant bigot such as yourself.

      Squeeky and everyone else,

      I’ve finally figured out why David is out of breath—he’s so stupid that half the time he forgets how to breathe…

  • davidfarrar

    Northland10
    September 10th, 2012 at 6:54 pm

    As you say, it’s a fundraising arm. Kapi’olani hospital has not confirmed anything, nor will they, nor can they without Obama’s expressed permission.

    If Obama is so proud of Kapi’olani being his natal hospital, one would think he would be proud enough share those records with his voting public.

    Here, again; one would think if Obama ever needed to pick up 10 points on Romney, he would publish his natal records.

    ex animo
    davidfarrar

    • Slartibartfast

      David “out of breath”,

      Only an idiot would suggest that President Obama could pick up a single vote by appeasing the birthers—to suggest that he could get 10% is beyond ludicrous. He’s best off making jokes about the birthers (because that’s all you are—a joke) and then pointing out how cozy Rmoney has been with birtherism. The only thing you are your ilk are good for is to be the butt of jokes and to spread your pariah status to anyone who associates themselves with you.

    • Monkey Boy

      If Obama is so proud of Kapi’olani being his natal hospital, one would think he would be proud enough share those records with his voting public.

      IF DOOFUS DAVE IS CONVINCED THAT 50-YEAR OLD HOSPITAL RECORDS ARE STILL AVAILABLE, THEN HE SHOULD DEMONSTRATE THAT BY RETRIEVING HIS OWN. MY GUESS IS THAT HE IS CLOSER TO THE VENUE OF HIS BIRTH THAN THE PRESIDENT IS, AND HE IS NOT AS BUSY SINCE HE HAS AMPLE TIME TO PROLIFICALLY SPREAD FECAL MATTER THROUGHOUT THE INTERNET.

      Show us your records, Dave, otherwise be branded a serial liar. (oh, wait)… .

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: