Tag Archives: Chris Farrell

Brassy Birther Horns In On Radio Show!!! (A Critique)

beau geste

The Boogie-Woogie Birther Boy Was Certainly Different, But No One Wanted To Dance

Due to their shrinking numbers, and the inherent difficulties of trying to reproduce while delusional, Birthers are actively trying to recruit new members into their lifestyle. Some have been spotted hanging around comic book stores and Sci Fi conventions with big bags of candy and tin foil. Others have been taking cold-calling lessons from Jehovah Witnesses. Still others are experimenting with a more annoying approach to close their sale.

The new technique is based on the old one-foot-in-the-door-tactic. If you can just get one foot in the door, then the polite and meek housewife will hesitate to slam the door on your foot. Which gives the salesman a chance to run his mouth and push the product. Cheeky, but it worked. Wiki says this about foot-in-the-door:

Foot-in-the-door (FITD) technique is a compliance tactic that involves getting a person to agree to a large request by first setting them up by having that person agree to a modest request. The foot-in-the-door technique succeeds owing to a basic human reality that social scientists call “successive approximations”. Essentially, the more a subject goes along with small requests or commitments, the more likely that subject is to continue in a desired direction of attitude or behavioral change and feel obligated to go along with larger requests. FITD works by first getting a small ‘yes’ and then getting an even bigger ‘yes.’

The principle involved is that a small agreement creates a bond between the requester and the requestee. Even though the requestee may only have agreed to a trivial request out of politeness, this forms a bond which – when the requestee attempts to justify the decision to themselves – may be mistaken for a genuine affinity with the requester, or an interest in the subject of the request. When a future request is made, the requestee will feel obliged to act consistently with the earlier one.[5]

The reversed approach – making a deliberately outlandish opening demand so that a subsequent, milder request will be accepted – is known as the door-in-the-face technique.

I call the Birther variation on this the mouth-in-the-radio-show approach. Rick Wiles tried it the other day with Congressman Jeff Duncan of South Carolina. (See Note 3 below.) Now Mr. Chris Farrell, whose personal motto should be Ammo Dimini, tried this Friday, June 28, 2013 with Congressman Louis Gohmert (TX).  Farrell, supposedly an ex-French Foreign Legionnaire, called in with an innocuous request.  Here are some transcribed excerpts from Obama Ballot Challenge:

On Friday, June 28th 2013 Representative Louie Gohmert (R-TX) was questioned in a phone call by Chris Farrell, citizen journalist, while the congressman hosted‘Washington Watch with Tony Perkins,’ a daily internet radio program. . .

Congressman Gohmert“Let’s take a call from—we got a call from Louisiana. Chris, Let’s hear what’s on your mind Chris.”

Chris Farrell: “Hello Representative Gohmert.”

Gohmert: “Just call me Louie Chris.”

Farrell: “Yes Sir, Thank you. Louie. Chris Farrell. I too served in the Army, [Which Army, the French one???] and I want to ask you to consider that former Lieutenant Colonel Terry Lee Lakin, a surgeon in the US Army, was court martialed, dishonorably discharged, and imprisoned in military prison for requesting, consistent with the officer’s oath he had taken to defend the Constitution, authentication that his purported commander-in-chief did in fact legally occupy that position.

Then, sometime later, Mr. Obama presented the American people with documents supposedly authenticating his constitutional eligibility which have now been proven beyond any shadow of a doubt (to be fraudulent) by Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s volunteer Cold Case Posse…I was there at the Preliminary Release of the Findings of the Cold Case Posse as a student journalist, and let me tell you, nobody else from the mainstream media was there.

Ah, this mockery of our Constitution has to be brought to an end, and I’d like to ask you to read the petition that I wrote, the Petition to Abrogate—to actually retroactively abrogate the illegal elections of the constitutionally ineligible fraud who illegally represented himself as constitutionally eligible to be president and so was in the commission of crimes when he was illegally elected, and I claim to you that he is not now and never has been the president.”

Gohmert: “Well, let me comment on that, thank you Chris—ah—for your call.

I was not—I didn’t remember the prosecution for Colonel Lakin. We’ll look into that, but uh, I’ll tell you how bad it is: I had not ever said the president was not born in America, but I’m titled a “Birther” because I signed on as a co-sponsor of a Bill Posey Bill in the last Congress . . .

http://obamaballotchallenge.com/chris-farrell-questions-u-s-rep-louie-gohmert-on-radio-show-about-obama-eligibility-for-office

There is more at the link. As you can see, Farrell tried  a simple “please read my petition” request. The problem is, he did too  much selling on the front end. He made it clear he was a Birther with the hard sell line, ” his constitutional eligibility which have now been proven beyond any shadow of a doubt (to be fraudulent) . . .”  No Chrissy, it isn’t clear beyond a shadow of a doubt. Mike  Zullo himself recently said, “There is not enough evidence to convict him [Obama] on jaywalking … let alone anything else.”

Then, to compound that mistake, Farrell over talks himself. Before Gohmert has a chance to respond to the innocuous request, Farrell continues the same sentence with, “to actually retroactively abrogate the illegal elections of the constitutionally ineligible fraud who illegally represented himself as constitutionally eligible to be president and so was in the commission of crimes when he was illegally elected, and I claim to you that he is not now and never has been the president.”

Yes, the innocuous request and all that bile was crammed into a single run on sentence! Image a cult member trying to recruit a new patsy who says, “We are all so happy, won’t you hold hands and smile with us . . . because after the Mother Ship annihilates  the God-forsaken putrescent sinners who inhabit this living Hell Hole with its cleansing Atomic Ray of Miserable Screaming Death we all will have drunk the cyanide-laced Kool-Aid and be happy on the Eden Asteroid in our new non-physical body forms.” No! First you get them to hold hands and smile. Then, to come a dinner meeting. Then, the drugs and wild sex orgy. . . etc.

That is the kind of rookie mistake Birther Farrell made. Normally there is time for a salesman to get some on-the-job-training. The problem here is that the Birther product really sucks, and people who buy it just end up looking stupid to everybody else. Plus, the market is shrinking faster and faster.

Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter

Note 1.  The Image. This is Marty Feldman playing Digby Geste from the 1977 film, The Last Remake of Beau Gest. Wiki says:

It starred and was also directed and co-written by Marty Feldman. It is a satire loosely based on the novel Beau Geste, a frequently-filmed story of brothers and their adventures in the French Foreign Legion. The humor is based heavily upon wordplay and absurdity. Feldman plays Digby Geste, the awkward and clumsy “identical twin” brother of Michael York’s Beau, the dignified, aristocratic swashbuckler.

Spoofing the classic Beau Geste and a number of other desert motion pictures, the film’s plotline revolves around the heroic Beau Geste and his brother Digby’s misadventures in the French Foreign legion out in the Sahara, and the disappearance of the family sapphire, sought after by their money-hungry stepmother

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Last_Remake_of_Beau_Geste

Note 2 Foot In The Door Technique. Wiki has a good article on this. Here is another excerpt:

When someone expresses support for an idea or concept, that person is more likely to then remain consistent with their prior expression of support by committing to it in a more concrete fashion. A common example undertaken in research studies used this foot-in-the-door technique: Two groups are asked to place a large, very unsightly sign in their front yard reading “Drive Carefully”. The members of one group had previously been approached to put a small sign in their front window reading “Be a Safe Driver”, almost all agreed. In response to the “Drive Carefully” request 76 percent of those who were initially asked to display the small sign complied, in comparison with only 17 percent of those in the other group not exposed to the earlier, less onerous, request.

Having already shown ‘community spirit’ by taking part in the campaign to reduce the nation’s road carnage – ‘stepping forward’ as a “good citizen” by giving prominence to the “Be a Safe Driver” sign, a statement to the world – there is social pressure to also agree to a grander, if more inconvenient, version of the same exercise and in order to appear consistent in one’s beliefs and behaviour. There may well be other contributors, but it is likely that commitment and consistency play a significant role.

Note 3. Did Duncan Do Nuts??? For a similiar Birther effort, see this, where Host Rick Giles tries to make a sale:

https://birtherthinktank.wordpress.com/2013/06/22/did-duncan-do-nuts/

Note 4. Word Plays. Farrell likes to plop Anno Domini on his scribblings. Ammo Dimini has an entirely different meaning. . . Invariably Diminished.  For ESLs, a bugle is a horn, and a member of the brass family of instruments. Brassy also means impudent or brazen. The idiomatic phrase horn in on means:

horn in (on something)

Fig. to attempt to participate in something without invitation or consent. Are you trying to horn in on my conversation with Sally? I hope you are not trying to horn in on our party.

The image Easter Egg is a word play first on Deguello, a Mexican bugle call signifying “No Quarter.” Most Texans know the word from The Alamo story. But, the French word “Debile” means moronic and stupid, and is an extra word play on “the bile”, or venom. The Boogie-Woogie Birther Boy is based on:

Advertisements

Birther Smells Another Birther!!! Maybe. Who Knows???

beau hunks 4

Something Just Didn’t Smell Right, And Farrell Began To Wonder If His Skinny Friend Was As Dumb As He Seemed

Birther Chris Farrell, late of the French Foreign Legion, must have some kind of sinus problem. Here are a few excerpts from his recent Nasal Exposition.

Saturday, June 15, 2013

Orly Taitz? “I smell a rat” says PPSIMMONS Contributor

By Chris Farrell

 

Question: I am convinced that Atty. Orly Taitz is an Obama plant; an agent working to get out in front of any given dimension of the eligibility issue and derail its progress in the courts and diffuse its truthful dissemination in the media.

Now wait a minute. Orly Taitz can’t be BOTH a rat and a plant??? What’s next, she’s some kind of mineral??? Chris Farrell goes on to ask:

Could what appears to be an advance in the District of Columbia wherein Orly is proceeding in court against the Social Security numbers that have been employed by Mister Obama/Soetoro/Soebarkah/Bounel be a subversive effort at getting out in front of the evidence and destroying its credibility–an effort on the part of the Obama camp to achieve a ruling against such evidence as credible that will undermine the presentation of any related evidence presented in front of the Alabama Supreme Court where Atty. Larry Klayman is reported to, at some time in the future, present the evidence uncovered by Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s volunteer Cold Case Posse including evidence related to Mister Obama’s fraudulent Social Security numbers?

http://ppsimmons.blogspot.com/2013/06/orly-taitz-i-smell-rat-says-ppsimmons.html

Actually, in Earth language,  this was a very short Internet Article. Let me recap the whole thing for you:

Paragraph 1. Question. I am convinced Orly Taitz is trying to mess up and derail the eligibility question. (Note: This is a question??? It looks more like a statement or conclusion to me.)

Paragraph 2. Is Orly Taitz trying to mess up and derail the eligibility question in Washington D.C. before Larry Klayman can mess it up and derail it in Alabama??? (Note: OK, maybe I added a few snarky words, but the general thrust is the same. Plus, I think I found the missing question from Paragraph 1.)

Paragraph 3. Could Orly Taitz be a covert Obama agent  trying to mess up and derail the eligibility question??? (Note: Oops. maybe this is the missing question from Paragraph 1???)

Paragraph 4. Could Orly Taitz be a covert agent who is trying to mess up and derail the eligibility question through incompetence before it gets to the Alabama court??? (Note: Strangely, this question sounds familiar. Did I hear it just a few seconds ago, somewhere???)

Paragraph 5. Could Orly Taitz be a covert agent who is theatrically trying to mess up and derail the eligibility question before someone else can get it to court??? (Note: Now I know this is starting to sound familiar. This guy better lay off the questions because he is running out of room.)

Paragraph 6. Could Orly Taitz be a covert agent who is choreographically  trying to mess up and derail the eligibility question before someone else can get it to court??? (Note: OK, wait just a minute. Is Chris getting paid by the word???

Paragraph 7. Whose side is Orly Taitz on??? (Note: This was a very short paragraph containing only the six previous words. And, another darn question.)

Paragraph 8. If you ask me, I smell a rat. (Note: Now wait just a minute! WE didn’t get to ask anything. YOU did all the asking! Six whole paragraphs that all sounded about the same!!!)

Notice how Birthery the whole thing was.  Chris gave us a conclusion, then asked a series of questions which were all similar. Then, he reached the same conclusion that he started out with. Uh, isn’t something missing out of all this??? Like ANSWERS. Proof and evidence. That kind of stuff.

If anybody wants an example of how totally screwed up the Birther Mind is, this is it. Conclusions. . . backed up by questions. .    .with no evidence. . . and ending in the same conclusion. Hmmm. At least Orly Taitz should understand the process.

Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter

Note 1. The Image. This is from the hilarious 1931 Laurel and Hardy movie, Beau Hunks.  This seems appropriate for Mr. Farrell since he claims to have once been a member of The French Foreign Legion. Those who have seen the movie, or who know anything at all about the Legion, know that everybody who joins up is doing so to forget some woman. Here is a photograph I obtained which show the woman Mr. Farrell is still trying to forget:

Orly Worly 2

Note 2. Beau Hunks. Here is a link to the full movie. If you have never seen it, it is well worth the 35 minutes or so.

http://www.dailymotion.com/video/xt0sra_laurel-and-hardy-beau-hunks-1931-full_shortfilms

Note 3. For ESL’s, The Image Easter Egg,  riff raff:

riff•raff (ˈrɪfˌræf)

n.
1. disreputable people.
2. the lowest classes; rabble.
3. trash; rubbish.

[1425–75; late Middle English rif and raf every particle, things of small value < Old French rif et raf]

Just for fun, the Rif were Moroccan tribesman and the enemies of the French Foreign Legion in the Beau Hunks film. See this, from Wiki:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rif_War


The Mad Moldovan Versus Deputy Dork!!! (The Taitz v. Zullo Grudge Match)

intergender

Zullo Being Tormented By The Moldovan Crab!!!

Every spring, as the saps rise across the country, the Birthers seem to get feisty and fidgety.  There is always an undercurrent of struggle, much like animals competing for food. But it seems to intensify in the spring. They begin quarreling and fighting with each other in earnest. The male Birthers develop a strange desire to dominate and suppress the female Birthers. I would not be surprised if there was some kind of primitive rutting behavior going on.

In 2009, it was Philip Berg versus Orly Taitz:

http://www.obamaconspiracy.org/2009/05/liberi-et-al-v-taitz-et-al/

In February 2010, it was Taitz against her former para-legal Charles Lincoln and his witness, Lucas Smith:

http://www.ocweekly.com/2010-02-18/news/orly-taitz-florida/

In 2011, there was a quiet spell. I think maybe all the Donald Trump rumblings and subsequent April 27, 2011 release of Obama’s long form birth certificate quieted the herd down. If I were doing active field research, I would hypothesize that Donald Trump took on the role of Alpha Male, and the other male Birthers backed down in submission.

Last spring,  the feuding came back to life with a vengeance. This was the Orly Taitz-Dean Haskins kerfluffle.  See the 4-Part Birther Feud Trilogy which started here:

https://birtherthinktank.wordpress.com/2012/02/17/trouble-in-birther-paradise-0r-a-diet-of-worms-part-1-of-the-birther-feud-trilogy/

That conflict saw an active schism develop between the ObamaReleaseYourRecords Sophisticate Sect, and the Orly Taitz Raving Fundamentalists. Now, internecine conflict has erupted again. The PPSimmons blog has fired several rounds into Taitz on behalf of Zullo and crew. Here are several examples:

Has Orly Taitz “Stepped In It?” BHO Operative? Inept? … Or National Hero?

Here is the test. For a few months now – some have speculated that Orly Taitz may, in fact, be an Obama operative. They maintain that Orly has filed numerous cases and lost everyone while at the same time claiming to be the “world’s leading authority” in the matter. Her efforts have led, they say, to an ever increasing marginalization of real Obama identity fraud investigations. The fact that she continually calls for Arpaio and Zullo to “file charges” when she, as an attorney and world expert, should know that doing so would devastate the case in a legal sense, many believe is evidence that Taitz may be working for the other side. Why, many have asked, would the world’s leading expert and attorney continually push losing cases before federal courts only to make the birthers look more and more inept? Hmmm. Yes – why? indeed.

We at PPSIMMONS wish Orly “God-speed” in this matter. If she wins this case – we will loudly blow the trumpet for Orly Taitz and thank her profusely. But, alas, we don’t think that is going to happen.

So… is Orly Taitz an Obama operative? Is she merely an inept attorney desperately seeking fame and fortune, as some have suggested? … Or is she a national hero?  We hope and pray she is proven to be the latter. At this point though, the evidence doesn’t point that way.  Stay tuned…

http://ppsimmons.blogspot.com/2013/06/has-orly-taitz-stepped-in-it-bho.html

And this one,  which I really suspect is pheromone based:

Orly Taitz? “I smell a rat” says PPSIMMONS Contributor

By Chris Farrell

Question: I am convinced that Atty. Orly Taitz is an Obama plant; an agent working to get out in front of any given dimension of the eligibility issue and derail its progress in the courts and diffuse its truthful dissemination in the media.

Could what appears to be an advance in the District of Columbia wherein Orly is proceeding in court against the Social Security numbers that have been employed by Mister Obama/Soetoro/Soebarkah/Bounel be a subversive effort at getting out in front of the evidence and destroying its credibility–an effort on the part of the Obama camp to achieve a ruling against such evidence as credible that will undermine the presentation of any related evidence presented in front of the Alabama Supreme Court where Atty. Larry Klayman is reported to, at some time in the future, present the evidence uncovered by Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s volunteer Cold Case Posse including evidence related to Mister Obama’s fraudulent Social Security numbers?

Could Atty. Taitz’ presentation of the evidence surrounding Mister Obama’s fraudulent Social Security Numbers be nothing less than a managing by a covert agent working for Obama’s team of the public portrayal in the media of such evidence as unreliable? A close look at her presentation of the evidence will tell.
In other words: Is Atty. Taitz managing the defeat of such evidence by means of weakly presenting the evidence in such a fashion which permits its defeat as legitimate in the D.C. courtroom, thus undermining any future–as in its introduction before the Alabama State Supreme Court–presentation of the evidence or news reporting on any such presentation?

Orly Taitz, a second degree black belt in Taekwondo, is no Shy Violet, and has fired quite a few broadsides, herself. She will not back down.

I feel like the law enforcement people putting bets on the maniac treasure hunters in It’s A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World.  I guess it comes with the territory. So, my money is on Taitz! She has the legs to see this thing through to the end.  Zullo and his boys haven’t made it to court once in over a year. They are great at standing around and crowing, but when it comes to putting pencil to paper and doing something, they all seem to have other places to be.

Plus, Taitz can do her own dirty work. She doesn’t need to fight through mouthpieces. So, let’s get ready to rumble!

Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter

Note 1. The Wrestling Hold.  Taitz has Zullo in the Moldovan Crab hold. This  is a Rocking Horse variation of the Reverse Boston Crab.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boston_crab

The Moldovan Crab variation was perfected by Gypsies in the late 1700’s as a way to immobilize a victim, while an accomplice picked their pockets. Taitz, a student of Krav Maga, viciously utilizes her body weight against Zullo’s hamstrings rather than merely locking his legs with hers.  If Zullo had pockets in his wrestling costume, his wallet and valuables would be ripe pickings. This video shows the less advanced variation of this technique as utilized by Cassidy Riley against AJ Styles.

It is unlikely Zullo will be able to overcome the damage done by the hold, his legs having been effectively cut out from under him. While he may not lose his wallet, he will be physically incapable of soliciting funds for a considerable length of time.

Note 2. Intergender Wrestling: Some people may not believe that Intergender Wrestling actually occurs as an organized activity outside of bedrooms and back seats, but as this video clearly shows, it was an established sport by 1981. Mr. Andrew Kaufman, who may or may not be dead,  was the first champion. He can be distinguished from Deputy Zullo above by his lack of a mustache. Here is his match against The Red Snapper!

Note 3. Sexual Components of Intergender Wrestling.: Actually, Intergender Wrestling has a long history, with and without sexual components. Time and space limit the discussion to Andrew Kaufman who, as reported by Brian Nemtusak:

Zmuda set up Kaufman’s first private wrestling match in 1978, actually a contest between two female friends based on a rumor that Elvis had a wrestling fetish. Kaufman ended up wrestling and sleeping with one of them, which would become the formula for hundreds of subsequent conquests. Zmuda and Kaufman soon incorporated “intergender wrestling” into Kaufman’s act, initially on college tours and then on SNL. Neither author makes excuses for Kaufman–for him, wrestling was a turn-on and, even in the context of his show, a shtick for getting laid. (Midway through most matches Kaufman would invite his opponent to join him after the show, and according to Zmuda about a third of them weren’t hard to convince; eventually Kaufman would install a wrestling mat next to his bed.) But wrestling was also another childhood passion that perfectly matched his choreographed fakery and manufactured conflict, well suited to stoking the audience’s scorn. Only the sexist goading was entirely phony, yet it polarized his fans as never before and generated a backlash that would only begin with demands that Kaufman wrestle a man.

http://www.chicagoreader.com/chicago/being-andy-kaufman/Content?oid=901185