Tag Archives: Nonsense

Sharon Rondeau: When The Un-informed Authorities Meet The Uniformed Authorities!!!


After They Explained The Meaning Of GFY! To Sharon Rondeau, She Just Stood There With A Blank Look On Her face

Sharon Rondeau, the indefatigable editor of the Post and Email, tried to involve the military in her Birther silliness and got uniformly dismissed. And not politely. Here is an excerpt from ObamaReleaseYourRecords:

The military has remained silent on the Obama eligibility/identity issue. At 7:13 a.m. EDT on Thursday, The Post & Email contacted Public Affairs Officer Lt. Col. Catherine Wilkinson for comment on the declaration of forgery regarding Obama’s documentation:

Hi Cathy, my newspaper has been following the Obama eligibility/identity question for the last four years since its inception in August 2009.

May I obtain a statement from the military about whether or not they are aware that the long-form birth certificate image posted on the White House website since April 27, 2011 has been declared a “computer-generated forgery” by a law enforcement investigation? http://www.mcsoccp.org/joomla

Is the military aware that a congressional investigation into the forgery might be launched as a result of the Cold Case Posse’s investigation? http://www.wnd.com/2013/06/obama-birth-certificate-doubts-head-to-capitol

Does the military have the ability to analyze the Obama birth certificate image and Selective Service registration form to determine if they are authentic? If so, why has that not been done?

What are the ramifications if the U.S. military has been taking orders from someone who achieved the office of president and commander-in-chief by fraud?

Thank you very much.

Sharon Rondeau, Editor
The Post & Email
P.O. Box 195
Stafford Springs, CT 06076

At approximately 9:30 a.m. EDT, we received a response from Lt. Col. J. Todd Breasseale, which reads:

Dear Ms. Rondeau,
> We can only assume that your query is not a legitimate question and is some sort of nonsensical joke.
> We are happy to consider reality-based requests, but do not entertain absurdities from the web.
> Very respectfully,
> Todd

There is more at this link:


Ms. Rondeau pretended to be confused by this, and you can read at the link above how she sent a second indignant inquiry, and got a polite one word response, “Noted.”

But, should she really be surprised? The Cold Case Posse supposedly has proof that Obama’s online image of his long form birth certificate is a forgery. Yet, no prosecutor has touched it. Gee, I wonder why that is??? Don’t you really try to get a prosecutor to look into something that is allegedly criminal BEFORE you contact the Pentagon??? What are they supposed to do anyway, invade Pennsylvania Avenue or something???

She may as well have contacted the Military Authorities about phony Moon Landings. Rondeau got the response that she knew she would get, and now she gets to play Birther Victim, and get some tears and group hugs from the other indignant Birthers.


Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter

Note 1. The Image. This is the beautiful Patricia Laffin in her role as The Devil Girl From Mars (1954).

Perplexed Pixelated Patriot Packs A Peck Of Panicky Piffle!!!

After Finishing Off The Punch Bowl, The Pixelated Patriot Was Ready To Piddle Around

Some blogger known as the Pixel Patriot has written a nonsensical article:


Now how does Pixel Patriot go about proving this sensational charge???

First, he lays out a historical fact from World War II:

Velvalee Dickinson or the “Doll Woman” was convicted of espionage against the United States for Japan during World War II. FBI Laboratory cryptographers determined from her intercepted letters about dolls which she encrypted had referenced Allied war ships involved in the attack on Pearl Harbor. Coded words were intended to inform the enemy of the status of these ships such as their location, condition and repair.

Next, he springs this judicial SMOKING GUN, where a judge in the above case used the term NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!!!

Federal District Court Judge Shackelford Miller Jr.’s comments during the sentencing of Velvalee Dickinson were significant because he directly correlated the connection of why being a Natural Born Citizen is at the heart of one’s loyalty to their country:

(Click on Image to enlarge.)

Because Velvalee Dickinson was born on American soil (Jus Soli) to two parents who were both American citizens at the time she was born (Jus Sanguini), the court “found it hard to believe” she could be disloyal. Therefore, the court considered in its comments at sentencing the classification of Natural Born Citizen to be a method by which citizens of the nation derive their loyalty to the nation.

Thirdly, Pixel Patriot brings in the all important Elementary School angle:

The NSA or the National Security Agency provides educational materials to Elementary schools for academic development. At their website under the ACADEMIA TAB can be found Elementary School Concept Development Units dating as far back as 1995. For this outreach the agency uses the application of math, statistical analysis, fractions, Geometry/Algebra, measurements and patterns in a classroom setting.

On page 56 the requirements for being President of the United States are included as “Other Useful Information”. It does not inform the participant that the requirements are from Article II of the U.S. Constitution but it does state that you MUST:

– Be a natural born citizen.

– Be at least 35 years old.

– Have lived in the United States for 14 years.

MUST would indicate these are not optional. So does the Constitution.

However, in 2004, this same exercise did not include the additional useful information.
(archived here)

Fourthly, Pixel Patriot brings in the U.S. military, who uses the term NATURAL BORN CITIZEN:

(Click on Image to enlarge.)

And finally, (Thank God!) he ties in something from the USCIS, who also use the term NATURAL BORN CITIZEN:

The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, or USCIS has regulations that delineates between native born Citizens and natural-born Citizens.  The implications being Article II of the U.S. Constitution is not some archaic or out-dated concept.  It is an existing law that requires compliance.

(Click on Image to enlarge.)

Here is a link to the whole ball of wax so that you can try to make sense of it for yourself:


Now, did anybody else notice that you don’t ever see anything about these entities defining natural born citizens to require two citizen parents??? Do two citizen parents produce natural born citizens? Of course. So do two Lapplanders if the kid is born inside the United States.  Did Pixel Patriot ever tie in World War II to Obama, who was born 20 years later? Or, did he tie in the elementary school stuff in 2004, about 40 years after Obama was in elementary school, to anything? Is there anything at all in the article to support this headline:


Pixel Patriot simply found the words natural born citizen here and there across the Internet, ascribed the Birther definition to it, and then concluded that anybody who doesn’t act as if that definition was accurate and legally valid is guilty of something.  Job done! However, there is no actual reasoning in the article. There is no recognition of the multiple courtroom losses. There is no recognition that most Americans don’t believe the two citizen parent nonsense, and more importantly that ZERO courts have bought into it. Where has Pixel Patriot been for the last four years???

There is not even logical consistency. If the Birther definition requiring two citizen parents is so self-evident, then where is the cover-up???  Heck, the whole country is on it. Why didn’t he write an article entitled this:


I mean, Jerome Corsi never said anything about Obama requiring two citizen parents in his 2008 book,The  Obama Nation. Was Deputy Jerry in on it, too???

This is a dumb, idiotic, childish, superficial article and very poorly argued. Pixel Patriot did a pretty good job of insuring every sentence had a subject and a verb, but beyond that any relationship to comprehensible argument is missing. It is like something a monkey banging on a keyboard with automatic SpellChek and GrammarChek would produce. Which made it good enough to get fifteen minute of infamy at ObamaReleaseYourRecords.

Do any Birthers actually read beyond the headlines of crap like this???

Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter

Note 1. Pixelated.

Main Entry: pixelated 2
Part of Speech: adj
Definition: bewildered, confused; slightly insane; also called pixilated


Nonsense, foolish talk; To act or speak in a futile, ineffective, or nonsensical manner; To waste, to fritter away.

Note 2. Image Easter Egg. A word play on punch, the drink, and punch drunk, the mental condition:

1. Showing signs of brain damage caused by repeated blows to the head. Used especially of a boxer.
2. Behaving in a bewildered, stupified, confused, or dazed manner.

The British Hysterical Society Presents Lord Monckton (Or, A Flashman In The Pan???)

I learned that he was in the diplomatic, which didn’t surprise me, for he was a born toad-eater with a great gift of genteel sponging and an aversion to work.

Well, I have run across Lord Monckton before, and he seems a little too interested in the whole Birther issue, if you know what I mean. He is definitely educated, and speaks well.  He is fun to listen to and presents himself in a dignified manner. But I have to wonder what in the world a person like that is doing being a birth certificate Birther??? I mean, it’s like finding a chimpanzee in a tuxedo, and you just get this feeling that something’s not right.

Now, I am not going not make the same mistake as Wayne Allyn Root and CDR Kerchner, and try to tell you that my gut instincts and hunches are the same thing as documentation. Because they aren’t.  But I get the same feeling I got when I used to see this commercial:

The music is nice, the soldiers are all in step, and the narrator is polished. But you know if you give “nineteen dollars ninety” for this ring, you’re probably getting screwed. (See the notes below for a very funny youtube video about this offer, and a hilarious New York Post article about the company, which started off as the British Historical Society, but sort of had to reinvent itself a few times.)

Anyway, back on topic, Lord Monckton of Brenchley  is in the headlines again over at ObamaReleaseYourRecords, via World Net Daily, with this:

Exclusive: Christopher Monckton of Brenchley calls GOP treasonous for eligibility inaction


and promoting this sort of foolishness:

It is 24 pages long, and here is a pdf file of it, in case you have problems with scribd at the site. (I think they can only process one of these per household, so behave yourself accordingly.)

Moncktons A Hereditary Peers Briefing Paper (LONDON JUNE 2012)

The document is put together in a very professional manner, and contains text, images and exhibits. It is very readable. However, when you wring out the mop, all you get is the same dirty water that Deputy Jerry Corsi and the Cold Case Posse emptied out on us. I do love the shtick on page 17, Implications For Her Majesty’s Government, where Obama’s hostility is evidenced by his removal of Churchill’s Bust.

That whole section is put in to elevate the Birther madness to a level of seriousness where some court may look at it. I expect to see this document introduced as evidence or as an exhibit to future Birther legal ventures. I would not be surprised to see Requests for a New Hearing start cropping up from the Birther Hinterland, with this as support.

While I absolutely adore the grace and elegance of this particular document, it is still nothing but a bunch of nonsense. This time with an English theme, as opposed to The Cowboy and Indian aura of Sheriff Joe’s horse opera. But all the fancy airs and lah de dahs of Royalty and Peers and Her Majesty and Oxley of Sarbanes and Monckton of Brenchley is going to sell like hotcakes out there among the Birthers and others who would pay the “nineteen dollars ninety” for the ring, if they only had the dough.

Ta Ta.

Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter

Note 1. Youtube video. Here is avery funny video on the ring commercial. Pay attention to the seal. Put down any liquids you are holding, unless you hate your keyboard.

Note 2: The New York Post Article. This is a scream, and you have to read the whole thing! Here are a few excerpts, and the link follows:

It’s hard to tell what’s the bigger fake — the $20 Princess Diana ring or the company hawking it.

This week, customer-service reps enthusiastically pushed Telebrands’ bogus royal organization while taking advance orders for its simulated sapphire and cubic-zirconium ring.

Asked to describe the purpose of the British Historic/Historical Society, a Telebrands rep who identified herself as Sophie put a Post reporter on hold “to verify that information before releasing it to you.” Returning to the phone after several minutes, she said, “The society was founded in 1868 and remains the foremost society in Great Britain promoting and defending the scholarly study of the past.” [Squeeky Note: Oh, great shades of the Birthers. . .]

Told that she’d just described the Royal Historical Society, a legit, London-based organization, and not the so-called British Historical Society, Sophie said, “It’s the same thing.”

“So the Royal Historical Society is endorsing and selling me this ring?”

“Yes,” Sophie said.

New York Post Fake Royal Organization Article

Note 3.  The Alternate Title.  A Flashman in the Pan. Well,  the full Flashman reference follows, but think here, a scoundrel.  Meanwhile, the idiom itself means:

1 a sudden spasmodic effort that accomplishes nothing;

2. one that appears promising but turns out to be disappointing or worthless.

Note 4. Flashman. Oh, where do I begin? My father was really big into this series of books. I remember him sitting in his recliner and LHAO as he read these. Anyway, Wiki says:

Flashman is a 1969 novel by George MacDonald Fraser. It is the first of the Flashman novels.

Presented within the frame of the supposedly discovered historical Flashman Papers, this book describes the bully Flashman from Tom Brown’s Schooldays. The book begins with an explanatory note saying that the Flashman Papers were discovered in 1965 during a sale of household furniture in Ashby, Leicestershire. The papers are attributed to Harry Paget Flashman, who is not only the bully featured in Thomas Hughes’ novel, but also a well known Victorian military hero (in Fraser’s fictional England). The papers were supposedly written between 1900 and 1905.

The subsequent publishing of these papers, of which Flashman is the first, contrasts the previously believed exploits of a (fictional) hero with his own more scandalous account, which shows the life of a cowardly bully. Flashman begins with his own account of expulsion from Rugby and ends with his fame as the “Hector of Afghanistan”, detailing his life from 1839 to 1842 and his travels to Scotland, India, and Afghanistan. It also contains a number of notes by the author, in the guise of a fictional editor, giving additional historical information on the events described. The history in these books is quite accurate; most of the people Flashman meets are real people.

Flashman’s expulsion from Rugby for drunkenness leads him to join the Army for what he hopes will be a sinecure. He joins the11th Regiment of Light Dragoons commanded by Lord Cardigan whom he toadies in his best style. After an affair with a fellow officer’s lover, he is forced to fight a duel but wins after promising a large sum of money to the pistol loader to give his opponent a blank load in his gun. He does not kill his opponent but instead delopes and accidentally shoots the top off a bottle thirty yards away, an action that gives him instant fame and the respect of the Duke of Wellington.

However, once it was found out what they were fighting over, Flashman is stationed in Scotland. He is quartered with the Morrison family, and soon enough he takes advantage of one of the daughters, Elspeth. After a forced marriage, Flashman is required to resign the Hussars due to marrying below his station. He is given another option, to make his reputation in India.

Note 5.  The Image Caption. This is a quotation from Flashman on the March, p.10, Harper Collins, paperback edition 2005. I found it here at this very addictive website, Flashman’s Retreat:


Note 6. The Image Easter Egg.  It’s All Balls And Banbury  The above website referenced this:

The town’s reputation for untruth underlies later sayings: the apparently proverbial phrase ‘Banbury glosses’ was used in 1530 and 1571 to mean twistings of the truth, (fn. 45) and may be the origin of later allusions to a tall story as ‘a Banbury story’; (fn. 46) another saying, recorded in 1660, may be related to the above but more likely originated in a specific incident: ‘as wise as the mayor of Banbury, who would prove that Henry III was before Henry II’; (fn. 47) a further obscure proverb, recorded in 1639, was ‘he has brought his hogs to a Banbury market’. (fn. 48)


What’s Wrong With This Picture??? (Or, The Great Birther Bait And Switch)

Some People Swore They Saw An Extra Smiley Face In The Image

Well, I usually check out the ObamaReleaseYourRecords website every day to see what’s shaking in the Birther Universe. I have noticed lately that EVERY POST seems to have the same message buried in it, right before the Kerchner Krap  scribd stuff.  Below is a screenshot of part of that message: (Click on the Image to enlarge it.)

Here is the link to this particular example:


Outside of the advertising for Kerchner’s Art2SuperPAC  aka POOPpac did anything else in there  get your attention??? Maybe a little something that doesn’t make sense? Here, let me make it easy:

If someone has DOCUMENTED PROOF of something, why are we being directed to an AUDIO link???   Why aren’t we being directed to a DOCUMENT???  Maybe not to worry. Some guy named Breitbart Reporter Charles Johnson has an audio sooo, let’s go there. Then, when you hit the link, you get taken to this: (Click on the Image to enlarge it.)

Uh, was ist los ??? Now, we get some stuff from Breitbart Reporter Wayne Allyn Root. Huh. . . is this the old bait and switch??? Wow, there sure must be a lot of those  Breitbart Reporters running around the place.  Wait a minute. What does that little blurby thingy say???

What’s with this smoking gun WILL BE stuff??? Doesn’t WILL BE mean that it will happen sometime in the future? Not NOW? Crap, am I just being jerked around or what?  Oh wait, there is a video and an UPDATE BELOW VIDEO. Yippee!!! It’s been three weeks now since this article was first posted. Maybe they have managed to get the documentation together in the meantime???

Nope. No such luck. The first video is some radio talk show conversation between Wayne Allyn Root and Joe Pags. Blah, blah, blah, blah, and NO DOCUMENTATION.

The next two videos are of Wayne Allyn Root again, with Sean Hannity, and there is the same  blah, blah, blah,blah, and NO DOCUMENTATION. Don’t waste your time on the first two videos. The final 3:07 video tells the whole story. You wanna guess what the DOCUMENTATION is that Obama is an Indonesian citizen??? Sit down, because you may collapse in laughter, or shocked disbelief.


Yes, this whole stupid, frigging bunch of repetitious crap about  DOCUMENTATION comes down to Wayne Allyn Root’s HUNCHES and GUT INSTINCT that something is wrong.  Watch the whole thing below, but particularly the part at 2:05, where Root says:

I’m being honest. I don’t know. It’s a gut instinct.

Sooo,  to recap this, CDR Kerchner and the Birthers are going around telling people they have DOCUMENTATION and the documentation is just some clown’s GUT INSTINCT and HUNCH.  I still don’t know who Breitbart Reporter Charles Johnson is, and the links all go to Wayne Allyn Root stuff.  Did Wayne Allyn Root illegally usurp Charles Johnson’s identity???  Who knows?

Maybe they should have used this title:

Breitbart Reporter has a gut instinct hunch that Obama is Indonesian Citizen.

Somehow, I don’t think it would have mattered much to the Birthers if they had. It is sad to watch supposedly rational people wallow around in nonsense like this.

Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter

Note 1. The Image. This is from the wonderful and bizarre  1953 documentary film by Ed Wood, Glen or Glenda.  Wiki says, in part:

Wood’s big break came in 1953 when he was hired by producer George Weiss to make an exploitation film, I Changed My Sex, based on the life of transsexual Christine Jorgensen. After Jorgensen refused to collaborate on the film, Wood wrote a new autobiographical screenplay titled Glen or Glenda, a sincere and sympathetic study of transvestism. Wood directed and, using the alias Daniel Davis, played the titular character who has a fetish for cross-dressing and angora sweaters.[Which explains the Image Easter Egg.]

Glen or Glenda, shot in just four days for $26,000, was done in a semi-documentary style. Narration and voice-over dialog was added to generous amounts of film-library stock footage (a cost-saving trick he used in his later films).  Bela Lugosi, who was not told the film was about a transvestite, was paid $1,000 in cash for one day of filming. In a dark haunted-house set, speaking in metaphors and nursery rhymes, he played a portentous, omnipotent narrator.

The centerpiece of the film is a 15-minute fantasy sequence that illustrates Glen’s tormented state of mind. Wood utilizes a barrage of surreal, dream-like vignettes with personalized symbolism. Producer George Weiss also inserted footage of flagellation and bondage, reminiscent of the fetish films of Irving Klaw, from another production. In this sequence, Barbara is pinned beneath a large tree (in her living room), and Glen rescues her; they are married with the Devil acting as best man; a shirtless man vigorously flogs a woman reclining on a couch; lewd burlesque dancers gyrate to blaring jazz music and tear at their clothes; a woman gagged and bound to a yoke-like pole is untied by another gagged woman; a lust-crazed man roughly assaults a seductress in a flimsy negligee; an enraged Glenda rips Barbara’s blouse to shreds after she laughs at his appearance. Bela Lugosi appears in several scenes also rejecting Glenda and repeating the phrase “snips and snails and puppy-dog tails”. The film was released under several regional titles such as Transvestite, I Led Two Lives, and He or She?.

Note 2. Bait and Switch. A less than scrupulous sales tactic. Wiki explains the strategy:

Bait-and-switch is a form of fraud, most commonly used in retail sales but also applicable to other contexts. First, customers are “baited” by advertising for a product or service at a low price; second, the customers discover that the advertised good is not available and are “switched” to a costlier product.

Wiki also explains that there is a non-retail use of this tactic, for example:

Online dating sites have been known to post fake profiles as a way of enticing people to join; in some cases, employees of the site’s parent company send messages via a sockpuppet in order to encourage non-paying users to upgrade so they can message back.

Let me add to that non-retail use:

Birther websites are well known to promote new theories and put forth new facts, to reel in the unsuspecting individuals.  While either false or unsupported by evidence, these new discoveries are loudly touted across the Birther websites, and the converts get so caught up in the hoopla that they forget to critically examine the information.

Note 3. The Follow The Links Game! If you have a few minutes, start clicking on the various links in the Breitbart Reporter story above and watch how you get shuffled around to the same stuff, time and time again. It is amusing, in sad way.

Vattel Birthers Should Just STFU!!! (A White Paper)

OK, this is a long one, but I promise to KISS. (KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID!!) (LOL!!!) Anyway, there are TWO kinds of Birthers. There are Birthers like me who believe Obama was born in Kenya, and even if he wasn’t, he sure acts like it! We don’t believe the Birth Certificate on the Internet is real, and we are REALLY suspicious why he says he was born in Hawaii but his social security number is from Conneticut. Stuff like that. Dr. Taitz is that kind of Birther, too.

The other kind of Birther, the Vattle Birthers, believe that even if Obama was born in the United States of America, he is a illegal president because it take two American parents or maybe just one, or something like that because of stuff like Vattle. (I don’t spell Vattel right on purpose because it just seems so stupid to me.) Anyway, Vattle is a 300 year old French person from France so who cares what he thinks about anything!!! Plus, I have suggested the Vattle Birthers sue Obama in Lousiana which has French laws, and see if they can win there. Which I doubt.

Then we have the British Vattle Birthers who think Obama is British because his father was British, but that seems stupid, too, because the Queen of England ain’t the Boss of Me!!! The British are very nice people, and our friends now, but they can’t tell us nothing about nothing who our citizens can be. American laws do!!I have a youtube video to “prove” that which is really short and funny, too. (No alligators were harmed in the making of that video! (LOL!!!)).

So first, here is some stuff from law cases that I got from somebody named Black Lion who won’t say Hi! back to me, and is a very RUDE OBOT!, but his stuff is right. Every time I try to read the Vattle BLAH BLAH BLAH stuff, the Vattle Birthers are just getting beat the heck out of by the STUPID OBOTS, but that is the Vattle Birther’s fault for trying to make some sort of stupid point that doesn’t even make sense. Like the British stuff which is REALLY STUPID. So here is Black Lion’s stuff, and then my Anti-British Law video.

So after reading this, PLEEEEAAAASEE Vattle Birthers, STFU!!! and come help the rest of us Birthers in a fight we can’t lose. Plus, if you are NOT a Birther yet, and think we are all just crazy to be suspicious, you might want to read my first INTERNET ARTICLE here, A U.S. President Wouldn’t Lie, Would He??? which is here on this website in April and will really, really help you be suspicious of U.S Presidents. But here is the Law Case and a link so you can read the WHOLE THING.

“It thus clearly appears that by the law of England for the last three centuries, beginning before the settlement of this country, and continuing to the present day, aliens, while residing in the dominions possessed by the crown of England, were within the allegiance, the obedience, the faith or loyalty, the protection, the power, and the jurisdiction of the English sovereign; and therefore every child born in England of alien parents was a natural-born subject, unless the child of an ambassador or other diplomatic agent of a foreign state, or of an alien enemy in hostile occupation of the place where the child was born.”

“The same rule was in force in all the English colonies upon this continent down to the time of the Declaration of Independence, and in the United States afterwards, and continued to prevail under the constitution as originally established.”

“All persons born in the allegiance of the king are natural-born subjects, and all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens. Birth and allegiance go together. Such is the rule of the common law, and it is the common law of this country, as well as of England. We find no warrant for the opinion that this great principle of the common law has ever been changed in the United States. It has always obtained here with the same vigor, and subject only to the same exceptions, since as before the Revolution.”

“Based upon the language of Article II, Section 1, Clause 4 and the guidance provided by Wong Kim Ark, we conclude that persons born within the borders of the United States are “natural born Citizens” for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents. Just as a person “born within the British dominions [was] a natural-born British subject” at the time of the framing of the U.S. Constitution, so too were those “born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens.”

“The Plaintiffs do not mention the above United States Supreme Court authority in their complaint or brief; they primarily rely instead on an eighteenth century treatise and quotations of Members of Congress made during the nineteenth century. To the extent that these authorities conflict with the United States Supreme Court’s interpretation of what it means to be a natural born citizen, we believe that the Plaintiffs‟ arguments fall under the category of “conclusory, non-factual assertions or legal conclusions” that we need not accept as true when reviewing the grant of a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim.”

The Whole Law Case

Then here is my Anti-British law video I got off youtube, which “proves” (DUH!!!)the British ain’t the Bosses of Us, anymore:

Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter

PS: Since I wrote this, Black Lion said Hi! back to me, and said he wasn’t sure I was the same SQUEEKY, since STUPID OBOTS are always pretending to be me JUST TO GET ON MY LAST NERVE!!!! So Black Lion isn’t a rude OBOT after all. My mistake.

Squeeky Fromm
Girl Reporter